China’s Normative Balancing: Global Security Initiative and Middle East Security Architecture

This article examines China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) as a soft balancing strategy, specifically in the form of normative balancing. It employs a qualitative approach based on data collected from the official website of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as secondary sources including journal articles, newspapers and online news platforms. The study analyses the GSI as a normative balancing strategy and explores its implications for the security architecture of the Middle East using a normative balancing conceptual framework. As an effort by China to challenge the dominance of the United States through the promotion of alternative security norms, the GSI has implications for the Middle East security architecture in three key areas: first, it counters the United States’ common security rhetoric by advancing the concept of indivisible security; second, it introduces a Sino-centric perspective on regional security issues; and third, it emphasises the norm of non-interference as an alternative to the United States’ interventionist approach in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Central European Journal of International and Security Studies
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51870/cwai3912
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Normative Balancing: Global Security Initiative and Middle East Security Architecture

Bima Jon Nanda
1 citations
Central European Journal of International and Security Studies
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
8.52
article

China’s Normative Balancing: Global Security Initiative and Middle East Security Architecture

Bima Jon Nanda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) as a soft balancing strategy, specifically in the form of normative balancing. It employs a qualitative approach based on data collected from the official website of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as secondary sources including journal articles, newspapers and online news platforms. The study analyses the GSI as a normative balancing strategy and explores its implications for the security architecture of the Middle East using a normative balancing conceptual framework. As an effort by China to challenge the dominance of the United States through the promotion of alternative security norms, the GSI has implications for the Middle East security architecture in three key areas: first, it counters the United States’ common security rhetoric by advancing the concept of indivisible security; second, it introduces a Sino-centric perspective on regional security issues; and third, it emphasises the norm of non-interference as an alternative to the United States’ interventionist approach in the region.

Central European Journal of International and Security Studies
National Dong Hwa University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China’s Normative Balancing: Global Security Initiative and Middle East Security Architecture — Bima Jon Nanda · Central European Journal of International and Security Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS