The Revolution Will Not be Crowdfunded: Alternative Philanthropy's Politics

ABSTRACT This commentary on “Disrupting Philanthropy?: A Reality Check for Digital Crowdfunding” examines the self‐contradictory moral economy of crowdfunding, noting its misleading characterization of its own politics. It discusses the limits of crowdfunding as continuous with the limits of philanthropy and charity. Noting the typically patrician inflection of the term “philanthropy,” it suggests the class conflicts that the project of “disrupting philanthropy” engenders (or pretends to). Extending the authors' close reading of discourse about crowdfunding, the essay offers a complementary critique of this new form of finance. It suggests that in trading on rhetoric about disruption, democratization, revolution, and the power of “crowds,” crowdfunding justifies its de facto status as a substitute for social entitlements. Finally, it suggests opportunities for further research that examines the utility of crowdfunding's material failures and its actual accomplishments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philanthropy
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.70040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Revolution Will Not be Crowdfunded: Alternative Philanthropy's Politics

Martha Lincoln
1 citations
Journal of Philanthropy
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
article

The Revolution Will Not be Crowdfunded: Alternative Philanthropy's Politics

Martha Lincoln
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This commentary on “Disrupting Philanthropy?: A Reality Check for Digital Crowdfunding” examines the self‐contradictory moral economy of crowdfunding, noting its misleading characterization of its own politics. It discusses the limits of crowdfunding as continuous with the limits of philanthropy and charity. Noting the typically patrician inflection of the term “philanthropy,” it suggests the class conflicts that the project of “disrupting philanthropy” engenders (or pretends to). Extending the authors' close reading of discourse about crowdfunding, the essay offers a complementary critique of this new form of finance. It suggests that in trading on rhetoric about disruption, democratization, revolution, and the power of “crowds,” crowdfunding justifies its de facto status as a substitute for social entitlements. Finally, it suggests opportunities for further research that examines the utility of crowdfunding's material failures and its actual accomplishments.

Journal of PhilanthropyVol. 30(4)
San Francisco State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.