PHILOLOGY NOW: EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION

ABSTRACT In this introduction to the “Philology Now” theme issue, we make a case for “philology” as a useful sign under which to consider the ways historians are already working with words in their efforts to understand the past. Doing so, we recognize that “philology” has been variously defined. Rather than being normative or prescriptive about what philology entails, we proceed from a historical awareness that, in many of its uses, the word binds interrelated concerns of language, history, and method. The articles featured in this issue take up this nexus as providing opportunities for theory of history. Together, they demonstrate how attention to philology's methods of treating words in history enables self‐reflective work on disciplinary formations and their political legacies, on the relationships between language and power, and on temporality itself. It also enables innovative new approaches to words and concepts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and Theory
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70003
Primary Topic
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PHILOLOGY NOW: EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION

Courtney Weiss Smith, VALERIA LÓPEZ FADUL
History and Theory
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
article

PHILOLOGY NOW: EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION

Courtney Weiss Smith, VALERIA LÓPEZ FADUL
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this introduction to the “Philology Now” theme issue, we make a case for “philology” as a useful sign under which to consider the ways historians are already working with words in their efforts to understand the past. Doing so, we recognize that “philology” has been variously defined. Rather than being normative or prescriptive about what philology entails, we proceed from a historical awareness that, in many of its uses, the word binds interrelated concerns of language, history, and method. The articles featured in this issue take up this nexus as providing opportunities for theory of history. Together, they demonstrate how attention to philology's methods of treating words in history enables self‐reflective work on disciplinary formations and their political legacies, on the relationships between language and power, and on temporality itself. It also enables innovative new approaches to words and concepts.

History and TheoryVol. 64(4)
Wesleyan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.