Effects of Infant Formula Type on Early Childhood Growth Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Objective</b>: This study examines the effects of non-standard (lactose-reduced, hydrolyzed), cow-milk-based infant formulas on early childhood growth outcomes compared to standard formulas and breastfeeding. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included full-term infants with a birth weight >2500 g. Exposure and control data, including the type of infant formula [non-standard vs. standard] and breastfeeding status, were obtained at 2-month well visits. Growth outcomes (weight-for-age, length-for-age, BMI (Body Mass Index), and weight-for-length z-scores] were calculated using WHO (World Health Organization) growth standards at 1- and 2-year well visits. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate associations between formula type and growth outcomes, adjusting for maternal, infant, and socioeconomic factors. <b>Results</b>: A total of 5515 infants were included in the final analysis. Feeding practices included exclusive breastfeeding (35%), standard formula (42%), and non-standard formula (23%). Infants fed non-standard formulas had significantly higher weight-for-age, BMI, and weight-for-length z-scores at 12 months than those fed standard formulas, and after controlling for other covariates, weight-for-age and BMI z-scores remained significantly higher in the non-standard formula infants. At 24 months, only weight-for-age z-scores remained significantly higher for non-standard formula users compared to standard formula users. Both non-standard and standard formula groups showed significantly higher weight-for-age, BMI, weight-for-length, and length-for-age z-scores compared to breastfed infants at 12 and 24 months. <b>Conclusions</b>: Non-standard infant formula may have a differential effect on growth during the first year of life compared to standard infant formula and breastfeeding. Future research should explore the long-term health effects of non-standard infant formula use and the risk of obesity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17193111
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Infant Formula Type on Early Childhood Growth Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Donna A. Santillan, Patrick Ten Eyck, Aamer Imdad, Uzma Rani et al.
Nutrients
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

Effects of Infant Formula Type on Early Childhood Growth Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Donna A. Santillan, Patrick Ten Eyck, Aamer Imdad, Uzma Rani, William T. Story, Asher A Hoberg, Roba Alwasila
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: This study examines the effects of non-standard (lactose-reduced, hydrolyzed), cow-milk-based infant formulas on early childhood growth outcomes compared to standard formulas and breastfeeding. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included full-term infants with a birth weight >2500 g. Exposure and control data, including the type of infant formula [non-standard vs. standard] and breastfeeding status, were obtained at 2-month well visits. Growth outcomes (weight-for-age, length-for-age, BMI (Body Mass Index), and weight-for-length z-scores] were calculated using WHO (World Health Organization) growth standards at 1- and 2-year well visits. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate associations between formula type and growth outcomes, adjusting for maternal, infant, and socioeconomic factors. <b>Results</b>: A total of 5515 infants were included in the final analysis. Feeding practices included exclusive breastfeeding (35%), standard formula (42%), and non-standard formula (23%). Infants fed non-standard formulas had significantly higher weight-for-age, BMI, and weight-for-length z-scores at 12 months than those fed standard formulas, and after controlling for other covariates, weight-for-age and BMI z-scores remained significantly higher in the non-standard formula infants. At 24 months, only weight-for-age z-scores remained significantly higher for non-standard formula users compared to standard formula users. Both non-standard and standard formula groups showed significantly higher weight-for-age, BMI, weight-for-length, and length-for-age z-scores compared to breastfed infants at 12 and 24 months. <b>Conclusions</b>: Non-standard infant formula may have a differential effect on growth during the first year of life compared to standard infant formula and breastfeeding. Future research should explore the long-term health effects of non-standard infant formula use and the risk of obesity.

NutrientsVol. 17(19)
University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.