DNA damage checkpoints balance a tradeoff between diploid- and polyploid-derived arrest failures

The DNA damage checkpoint system ensures genomic integrity by preventing the division of damaged cells, primarily through the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints. How these checkpoints collectively minimize error remains unclear. Here, we exposed non-cancerous human cells to DNA damage and used single-cell imaging to monitor spontaneous arrest failure. Under intermediate damage, cells divided with error via two major routes: one involving mitotic skipping (extensive engagement of the G2/M checkpoint) followed by endoreplication (escape from G1/S), and the second involving escape from the G2/M checkpoint. These pathways produced distinct ploidy, nuclear morphology, and micronuclei composition. Simulations and experiments showed that strengthening one checkpoint reduced one failure mode but exacerbated the other, revealing an inherent tradeoff. Notably, our findings suggest that the DNA damage checkpoint system minimizes total error not by fully preventing either route but by permitting both to occur at sub-optimal frequencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116348
Citations
2
Primary Topic
DNA Repair Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DNA damage checkpoints balance a tradeoff between diploid- and polyploid-derived arrest failures

Kotaro Fujimaki, Galit Lahav, Ashwini Jambhekar
2 citations
Cell Reports
DNA Repair Mechanisms
1.61
article

DNA damage checkpoints balance a tradeoff between diploid- and polyploid-derived arrest failures

Kotaro Fujimaki, Galit Lahav, Ashwini Jambhekar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The DNA damage checkpoint system ensures genomic integrity by preventing the division of damaged cells, primarily through the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints. How these checkpoints collectively minimize error remains unclear. Here, we exposed non-cancerous human cells to DNA damage and used single-cell imaging to monitor spontaneous arrest failure. Under intermediate damage, cells divided with error via two major routes: one involving mitotic skipping (extensive engagement of the G2/M checkpoint) followed by endoreplication (escape from G1/S), and the second involving escape from the G2/M checkpoint. These pathways produced distinct ploidy, nuclear morphology, and micronuclei composition. Simulations and experiments showed that strengthening one checkpoint reduced one failure mode but exacerbated the other, revealing an inherent tradeoff. Notably, our findings suggest that the DNA damage checkpoint system minimizes total error not by fully preventing either route but by permitting both to occur at sub-optimal frequencies.

Cell ReportsVol. 44(10)
Harvard University (US), Center for Systems Biology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
DNA Repair Mechanisms
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DNA damage checkpoints balance a tradeoff between diploid- and polyploid-derived arrest failures — Kotaro Fujimaki, Galit Lahav, et al. · Cell Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS