Not feeling like winners: The higher educated and the AI revolution

Technological redundancy was so far seen as mainly a concern for lower to medium educated workers, but recent advances in machine learning and algorithmic decision-making technology – i.e., “artificial intelligence” (AI) – have raised concerns that the higher educated could now be affected as well. Adding to an emerging literature on the effects of AI exposure, I show that higher educated workers indeed feel that they are at risk of technological redundancy, and that these perceptions are related to objective exposure to AI technology. Specifically, I combine comparative survey data on workers’ subjective technological vulnerability with indicators of objective industry-level AI exposure and find a U-shaped pattern among higher educated workers: There is high perceived vulnerability in some “traditional” automation-exposed sectors (e.g., manufacturing) but also in a group of strongly AI-exposed white-collar industries (finance, real estate, IT), with a remaining pocket of low vulnerability in strongly interpersonal sectors (e.g., education, healthcare). These findings have broader societal and political implications, namely that further advancement in AI technology may contribute to a de-polarization of social risk and thus create the basis for new cross-class coalitions and social solidarity – but it may also reinforce current authoritarian tendencies.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/e25cd_v2
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not feeling like winners: The higher educated and the AI revolution

Carlo Knotz
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Not feeling like winners: The higher educated and the AI revolution

Carlo Knotz
article en

Abstract

Technological redundancy was so far seen as mainly a concern for lower to medium educated workers, but recent advances in machine learning and algorithmic decision-making technology – i.e., “artificial intelligence” (AI) – have raised concerns that the higher educated could now be affected as well. Adding to an emerging literature on the effects of AI exposure, I show that higher educated workers indeed feel that they are at risk of technological redundancy, and that these perceptions are related to objective exposure to AI technology. Specifically, I combine comparative survey data on workers’ subjective technological vulnerability with indicators of objective industry-level AI exposure and find a U-shaped pattern among higher educated workers: There is high perceived vulnerability in some “traditional” automation-exposed sectors (e.g., manufacturing) but also in a group of strongly AI-exposed white-collar industries (finance, real estate, IT), with a remaining pocket of low vulnerability in strongly interpersonal sectors (e.g., education, healthcare). These findings have broader societal and political implications, namely that further advancement in AI technology may contribute to a de-polarization of social risk and thus create the basis for new cross-class coalitions and social solidarity – but it may also reinforce current authoritarian tendencies.

Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.