Convergence-Equivalent DF and AR Iterations with Refined Data Dependence: Non-Asymptotic Error Bounds and Robustness in Fixed-Point Computations

Recent developments in fixed-point theory have focused on iterative techniques for approximating solutions, yet there remain important questions about whether different methods are equivalent and how well they resist perturbations. In this study, two recently proposed algorithms, referred to as the DF and AR iteration methods, are shown to be connected by proving that they converge similarly when applied to contraction mappings in Banach spaces, provided that their control sequences meet specific, explicit conditions. This work extends previous research on data dependence by removing restrictive assumptions related to both the perturbed operator and the algorithmic parameters, thereby increasing the range of situations where the results are applicable. Utilizing a non-asymptotic analysis, the authors derive improved error bounds for fixed-point deviations under operator perturbations, achieving a tightening of these estimates by a factor of 3–15 compared to earlier results. A key contribution of this study is the demonstration that small approximation errors lead only to proportionally small deviations from equilibrium, which is formalized in bounds of the form ∥s*−s˜*∥ ≤O(ε/(1−λ)). These theoretical findings are validated through applications involving integral equations and examples from function spaces. Overall, this work unifies the convergence analysis of different iterative methods, enhances guarantees regarding stability, and provides practical tools for robust computational methods in areas such as optimization, differential equations, and machine learning. By relaxing structural constraints and offering a detailed sensitivity analysis, this study significantly advances the design and understanding of iterative algorithms in applied mathematics.