Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations

The COVID-19 pandemic has extensively changed the state of psychological science from what research questions psychologists can ask to which methodologies psychologists can use to investigate them. In this article, we offer a perspective on how to optimize new research in the pandemic's wake. Because this pandemic is inherently a social phenomenon-an event that hinges on human-to-human contact-we focus on socially relevant subfields of psychology. We highlight specific psychological phenomena that have likely shifted as a result of the pandemic and discuss theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations of conducting research on these phenomena. After this discussion, we evaluate metascientific issues that have been amplified by the pandemic. We aim to demonstrate how theoretically grounded views on the COVID-19 pandemic can help make psychological science stronger-not weaker-in its wake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/fkjp-qz94
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations

Efrén O. Pérez, Emily Balcetis, C. Daryl Cameron, Betül Urgancı et al.
UNC Libraries
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations

Efrén O. Pérez, Emily Balcetis, C. Daryl Cameron, Betül Urgancı, Samantha Joel, Hank Rothgerber, Jonathan Cook, Michael A. Hogg, Brock Bastian, Matthew J. Hornsey, Carolyn Parkinson, Kurt Gray, Anthony L. Burrow, Gordon Kraft‐Todd, Kaylin Ratner, Daniel L. Rosenfeld, Roxane Cohen Silver, Elliot T. Berkman, Sarah E. Gaither, Steven W. Gangestad, Damian R. Murray, Frank Kachanoff, Joseph A. Vandello, Sarah Volz, Steve Loughnan, James D. Rounds, Tom Pyszczynski, Janet K. Swim, Elizabeth L. Haines, Cara C. MacInnis, Alison Ledgerwood, Jennifer K. Bosson, Randy T. Lee, Kristof Dhont, Martie G. Haselton, Vivian Zayas, Shai Davidai, A. Janet Tomiyama, Traci Mann, Mark R. Leary, Paul W. Eastwick, Gordon Hodson, Mark Schaller, Christian S. Crandall, Felix Thoemmes, Tiffany N. Brannon, Barbara A. Spellman, Nina Strohminger, Nick Haslam, Serena Chen, Thomas Gilovich, Yuen J. Huo
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has extensively changed the state of psychological science from what research questions psychologists can ask to which methodologies psychologists can use to investigate them. In this article, we offer a perspective on how to optimize new research in the pandemic's wake. Because this pandemic is inherently a social phenomenon-an event that hinges on human-to-human contact-we focus on socially relevant subfields of psychology. We highlight specific psychological phenomena that have likely shifted as a result of the pandemic and discuss theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations of conducting research on these phenomena. After this discussion, we evaluate metascientific issues that have been amplified by the pandemic. We aim to demonstrate how theoretically grounded views on the COVID-19 pandemic can help make psychological science stronger-not weaker-in its wake.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.