Support for liberal democracy in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Support for fundamental political rights is a defining feature of liberal democracy. Crises may undermine citizen support for these rights. Yet, existing research does not often distinguish support for ‘illiberal’ policies that encroach on fundamental political rights from other ‘intrusive’ crisis policy responses. By conducting a series of well-powered, preregistered conjoint and vignette experiments in the US and the UK during the height of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, we examine the extent to which citizens are willing to support policies that violate liberal democratic rights in a crisis as well as intrusive policies. Our results suggest that support for liberal democratic rights is quite robust, although endorsements by an in-group party or trusted expert can increase support for illiberal policies. Overall, we find noteworthy resistance to illiberal policy measures, such as postponing elections and banning protests, indicating popular commitment to liberal democratic norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Research
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1475676525100145
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Support for liberal democracy in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

Bert N. Bakker, Catherine E. De Vries, Kevin Arceneaux, SARA BINZER HOBOLT
1 citations
European Journal of Political Research
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
article

Support for liberal democracy in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

Bert N. Bakker, Catherine E. De Vries, Kevin Arceneaux, SARA BINZER HOBOLT
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Support for fundamental political rights is a defining feature of liberal democracy. Crises may undermine citizen support for these rights. Yet, existing research does not often distinguish support for ‘illiberal’ policies that encroach on fundamental political rights from other ‘intrusive’ crisis policy responses. By conducting a series of well-powered, preregistered conjoint and vignette experiments in the US and the UK during the height of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, we examine the extent to which citizens are willing to support policies that violate liberal democratic rights in a crisis as well as intrusive policies. Our results suggest that support for liberal democratic rights is quite robust, although endorsements by an in-group party or trusted expert can increase support for illiberal policies. Overall, we find noteworthy resistance to illiberal policy measures, such as postponing elections and banning protests, indicating popular commitment to liberal democratic norms.

European Journal of Political ResearchVol. 65(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Recherches Politiques de Sciences Po (FR), Bocconi University (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
London School of Economics and Political Science, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Support for liberal democracy in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic — Bert N. Bakker, Catherine E. De Vries, et al. · European Journal of Political Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS