Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: lexical or functional?

Despite having been a classic research topic for over 300 years (Gao and Liu 2020: 136), the fundamental issue of whether numeral classifiers (Cls for short) in Mandarin Chinese belong to a lexical or functional category still remains controversial. To address this issue, this paper presents arguments from diachronic, syntactic, semantic, cognitive, and experimental perspectives. On one hand, Mandarin Chinese Cls exhibit lexical properties, as evidenced by their semantic selection restrictions in relation to nouns. On the other hand, they also display functional properties, supported by arguments such as their grammaticalization, their substitution by the general Cl ge, and their syntactic analogy with auxiliary verbs. Furthermore, Mandarin Chinese Cls are predominantly functional, as demonstrated by three supporting arguments from diachronic, cognitive, and experimental perspectives. Additionally, this paper also addresses the question of whether Individual Cls, compared to other types of Cls, offer a very limited semantic space for the whole nominal phrase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36253/qulso-2421-7220-18659
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: lexical or functional?

Yufeng Ruan
Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali
Categorization, perception, and language
article

Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: lexical or functional?

Yufeng Ruan
article en

Abstract

Despite having been a classic research topic for over 300 years (Gao and Liu 2020: 136), the fundamental issue of whether numeral classifiers (Cls for short) in Mandarin Chinese belong to a lexical or functional category still remains controversial. To address this issue, this paper presents arguments from diachronic, syntactic, semantic, cognitive, and experimental perspectives. On one hand, Mandarin Chinese Cls exhibit lexical properties, as evidenced by their semantic selection restrictions in relation to nouns. On the other hand, they also display functional properties, supported by arguments such as their grammaticalization, their substitution by the general Cl ge, and their syntactic analogy with auxiliary verbs. Furthermore, Mandarin Chinese Cls are predominantly functional, as demonstrated by three supporting arguments from diachronic, cognitive, and experimental perspectives. Additionally, this paper also addresses the question of whether Individual Cls, compared to other types of Cls, offer a very limited semantic space for the whole nominal phrase.

Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi OrientaliVol. 11
Nankai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese: lexical or functional? — Yufeng Ruan · Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS