Can AI replace experts in the evaluation of cultural heritage? Based on the controlled experiments conducted on six architectural heritages

Abstract This study investigates the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to replace human experts in evaluating the conservation status of architectural heritage. Five mainstream AI models were employed to assess six architectural heritage sites in Kunming, Yunnan, China, using 18 evaluation indicators. The AI Evaluation Team (AET) and Expert Evaluation Team (EET) conducted comprehensive assessments, and the results were compared using the entropy weight method (EWM), independent sample t-tests, and kernel density estimations. The findings revealed no significant differences between the AET and EET outcomes, demonstrating that the AI’s assessment capability reached expert-level performance. Moreover, AI exhibits higher efficiency in information acquisition and work processes than human expertise. The objectivity of the AI-generated results was enhanced by the data-driven approach and the use of the EWM for indicator weighting. This study highlights the potential of AI in architectural heritage preservation, enabling the assessment of a larger number of heritage buildings within a shorter timeframe and overcoming the limitations of manual evaluation. The proposed method can be extended to assess various types of cultural heritage and predict future trends, providing a more efficient basis for heritage protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can AI replace experts in the evaluation of cultural heritage? Based on the controlled experiments conducted on six architectural heritages

Xueqing Tian, Tao Zhu, Yi Yang, Yu Wang
1 citations
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
2.35
article

Can AI replace experts in the evaluation of cultural heritage? Based on the controlled experiments conducted on six architectural heritages

Xueqing Tian, Tao Zhu, Yi Yang, Yu Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to replace human experts in evaluating the conservation status of architectural heritage. Five mainstream AI models were employed to assess six architectural heritage sites in Kunming, Yunnan, China, using 18 evaluation indicators. The AI Evaluation Team (AET) and Expert Evaluation Team (EET) conducted comprehensive assessments, and the results were compared using the entropy weight method (EWM), independent sample t-tests, and kernel density estimations. The findings revealed no significant differences between the AET and EET outcomes, demonstrating that the AI’s assessment capability reached expert-level performance. Moreover, AI exhibits higher efficiency in information acquisition and work processes than human expertise. The objectivity of the AI-generated results was enhanced by the data-driven approach and the use of the EWM for indicator weighting. This study highlights the potential of AI in architectural heritage preservation, enabling the assessment of a larger number of heritage buildings within a shorter timeframe and overcoming the limitations of manual evaluation. The proposed method can be extended to assess various types of cultural heritage and predict future trends, providing a more efficient basis for heritage protection.

Digital Scholarship in the HumanitiesVol. 40(4)
Yunnan Agricultural University (CN), Yunnan University of Finance And Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.