Revisiting the Chronology and Regional Interactions of the Xiaoheyan Culture (小河沿文化) in Liaoxi, China

This study examines the Xiaoheyan Culture (小河沿文化), previously regarded as a “missing link” in the Neolithic sequence of Northeast China. Its chronology is reassessed, and its cultural relationships with surrounding regions are investigated. By comparing the material culture of three debated regions, the Xiaoheyan Culture is defined as an independent tradition, distinguishable from the Xueshan Phase 1 Culture (雪山一期文化) and the Wufang Type (午方类型), based on differences in pottery types, vessel forms, decorative patterns, and burial structures. A chronological framework was established through the seriation of six major pottery types–deep bowl (深鉢), basin (盆), zun (尊), jar (壺), dou (豆), and pottery stand (器臺)-dividing the culture into three phases: emergence, development, and decline. Radiocarbon (C14) analysis places its existence at ca. 3200–2000 B.C.E., showing overlap with the late Hongshan Culture (红山文化) and continuity into the Lower Xiajiadian Culture (夏家店下层文化) without temporal gaps. Regional comparisons based on shared pottery types and radiocarbon consistency suggest that the Miaozigou Type (庙子沟类型) strongly influenced the formation of the Xiaoheyan Culture. Cultural exchanges with the Xueshan Phase 1 and Wufang traditions varied in intensity, while hybrid pottery of the Nanbaoligaotu Type (南宝力皋吐类型) indicates that this area functioned as a hub of interaction between the Xiaoheyan and Pianpu (偏堡文化) cultures.

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Archaeological Society
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47439/jkras.2025.3.725
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Chronology and Regional Interactions of the Xiaoheyan Culture (小河沿文化) in Liaoxi, China

The Korean Archaeological Society
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Revisiting the Chronology and Regional Interactions of the Xiaoheyan Culture (小河沿文化) in Liaoxi, China

article en

Abstract

This study examines the Xiaoheyan Culture (小河沿文化), previously regarded as a “missing link” in the Neolithic sequence of Northeast China. Its chronology is reassessed, and its cultural relationships with surrounding regions are investigated. By comparing the material culture of three debated regions, the Xiaoheyan Culture is defined as an independent tradition, distinguishable from the Xueshan Phase 1 Culture (雪山一期文化) and the Wufang Type (午方类型), based on differences in pottery types, vessel forms, decorative patterns, and burial structures. A chronological framework was established through the seriation of six major pottery types–deep bowl (深鉢), basin (盆), zun (尊), jar (壺), dou (豆), and pottery stand (器臺)-dividing the culture into three phases: emergence, development, and decline. Radiocarbon (C14) analysis places its existence at ca. 3200–2000 B.C.E., showing overlap with the late Hongshan Culture (红山文化) and continuity into the Lower Xiajiadian Culture (夏家店下层文化) without temporal gaps. Regional comparisons based on shared pottery types and radiocarbon consistency suggest that the Miaozigou Type (庙子沟类型) strongly influenced the formation of the Xiaoheyan Culture. Cultural exchanges with the Xueshan Phase 1 and Wufang traditions varied in intensity, while hybrid pottery of the Nanbaoligaotu Type (南宝力皋吐类型) indicates that this area functioned as a hub of interaction between the Xiaoheyan and Pianpu (偏堡文化) cultures.

The Korean Archaeological SocietyVol. 136
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.