Review and assessment of the quality of applications related to diet man-agement using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)

This article presents an evaluation of mobile applications for diet management using the Mobile App Rating Scale. The study identifies key factors influencing app quality, analyzes user engagement and satisfaction, and explores the impact of these apps on dietary behavior change. Four popular applications: Fitatu, Dine4Fit, FIT-WORLD, and Foodvisor - were assessed based on their features, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality. The results highlight that Foodvisor stands out with the highest overall ratings, particularly in user engagement and aesthetics. Conversely, Fit-World scored the lowest in several categories, emphasizing the need for improvement in functionality and user-specific features. These findings provide insights into enhancing app design to improve user experience and effectiveness in diet management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.7312
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review and assessment of the quality of applications related to diet man-agement using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)

Marek Miłosz, Kamil Lewartowski
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Education and Learning Interventions
article

Review and assessment of the quality of applications related to diet man-agement using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)

Marek Miłosz, Kamil Lewartowski
article en

Abstract

This article presents an evaluation of mobile applications for diet management using the Mobile App Rating Scale. The study identifies key factors influencing app quality, analyzes user engagement and satisfaction, and explores the impact of these apps on dietary behavior change. Four popular applications: Fitatu, Dine4Fit, FIT-WORLD, and Foodvisor - were assessed based on their features, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality. The results highlight that Foodvisor stands out with the highest overall ratings, particularly in user engagement and aesthetics. Conversely, Fit-World scored the lowest in several categories, emphasizing the need for improvement in functionality and user-specific features. These findings provide insights into enhancing app design to improve user experience and effectiveness in diet management.

Journal of Computer Sciences InstituteVol. 36
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.