Comperative analasys of JavaScript runtime environments

This article presents a comparative analysis of two JavaScript runtime environments: Node.js, the industry leader since 2009, and Bun, a newer and promising alternative introduced in 2022. The study evaluates their performance in two distinct experimental scenarios: handling HTTP requests and executing a computationally intensive algorithm for calculating Fibonacci numbers. These scenarios allow for the assessment of both I/O-bound and CPU-bound workloads. Benchmarking tools were used to measure the most important metrics, including total request handling time, average latency, and peak memory usage. By analyzing architectural differences and runtime optimizations, the article highlights the advantages and trade-offs of both environments. The findings offer developers valuable insights for selecting an appropriate platform for high-performance and scalable server-side applications, and contribute to the ongoing discussion on the evolution of JavaScript runtimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.7512
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comperative analasys of JavaScript runtime environments

Marek Miłosz, Konrad Kalman
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Software Engineering Research
article

Comperative analasys of JavaScript runtime environments

Marek Miłosz, Konrad Kalman
article en

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of two JavaScript runtime environments: Node.js, the industry leader since 2009, and Bun, a newer and promising alternative introduced in 2022. The study evaluates their performance in two distinct experimental scenarios: handling HTTP requests and executing a computationally intensive algorithm for calculating Fibonacci numbers. These scenarios allow for the assessment of both I/O-bound and CPU-bound workloads. Benchmarking tools were used to measure the most important metrics, including total request handling time, average latency, and peak memory usage. By analyzing architectural differences and runtime optimizations, the article highlights the advantages and trade-offs of both environments. The findings offer developers valuable insights for selecting an appropriate platform for high-performance and scalable server-side applications, and contribute to the ongoing discussion on the evolution of JavaScript runtimes.

Journal of Computer Sciences InstituteVol. 36
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.