Reproductive Intrusions: Evidence and Ethics
Feminist bioethicists have long shed light on the indignities and injustice of reproductive intrusions, be they coerced gestation or forced interventions during pregnancy and birth. Writing about the aftermath and implications of the Dobbs decision, Minkoff, Vullikanti, and Marshall (2024) reemphasize that compelling a person to carry a pregnancy to term and forcing a pregnant person to undergo unwanted interventions are two sides of the same coin: with pregnancy, a person’s liberty is severely circumscribed in both cases
Authors
- Anne Drapkin Lyerly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-6920)
- Miranda R. Waggoner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-6655)
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- UNC Libraries
- Published
- 2025-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.17615/3an3-gh64
- Primary Topic
- Health and Conflict Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health