Metal oxides in drug detection: Material innovations in electrochemical sensor development

Abstract Metal oxide (MO x )‐based electrochemical sensors have emerged as highly effective tools for drug detection, offering several advantages such as high sensitivity, excellent stability, and versatile applications across various drug families. This review explores the use of different MO x s, including iron oxide (Fe 3 O 4 , Fe 2 O 3 ), manganese oxide (MnO 2 , Mn 2 O 3 ), titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ), copper oxide (CuO), zinc oxide (ZnO), cobalt oxide (Co 3 O 4 ), nickel oxide (NiO), tungsten oxide (WO 3 ), and vanadium oxide (V 2 O 5 ), in the electrochemical detection of drugs. The sensors based on these materials exhibit outstanding performance, with some achieving detection limits in the low nanomolar to picomolar range, making them ideal for detecting drugs at trace levels in biological fluids. Notably, iron oxide and manganese oxide sensors excel in detecting neurotransmitters, anticancer drugs, and antibiotics. In contrast, cobalt oxide and copper oxide are particularly effective for anti‐inflammatory and analgesic drugs. Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide sensors demonstrate excellent stability and high sensitivity, making them suitable for clinical diagnostics and environmental monitoring. This review also discusses these sensors' linear range, detection limits, and practical applications in various therapeutic categories. Despite the promising results, challenges remain, such as enhancing sensor selectivity, reducing interference, and improving stability and reproducibility over time. Future advancements in nanocomposite materials and portable sensor technologies hold great potential for the widespread application of MO x ‐based electrochemical sensors in real‐time drug monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.70092
Primary Topic
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metal oxides in drug detection: Material innovations in electrochemical sensor development

Reenu Rani, Abdulrahman T. Ahmed, M. Ridha, Hussein Riyadh Abdul Kareem Al‐Hetty et al.
Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
article

Metal oxides in drug detection: Material innovations in electrochemical sensor development

Reenu Rani, Abdulrahman T. Ahmed, M. Ridha, Hussein Riyadh Abdul Kareem Al‐Hetty, Khalid A. Alkhuzai, Zainab Jamal Hamoodah, Byomakesh Dash, B. Saadi, Alisha Vashisht, Shaik Dariyabi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Metal oxide (MO x )‐based electrochemical sensors have emerged as highly effective tools for drug detection, offering several advantages such as high sensitivity, excellent stability, and versatile applications across various drug families. This review explores the use of different MO x s, including iron oxide (Fe 3 O 4 , Fe 2 O 3 ), manganese oxide (MnO 2 , Mn 2 O 3 ), titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ), copper oxide (CuO), zinc oxide (ZnO), cobalt oxide (Co 3 O 4 ), nickel oxide (NiO), tungsten oxide (WO 3 ), and vanadium oxide (V 2 O 5 ), in the electrochemical detection of drugs. The sensors based on these materials exhibit outstanding performance, with some achieving detection limits in the low nanomolar to picomolar range, making them ideal for detecting drugs at trace levels in biological fluids. Notably, iron oxide and manganese oxide sensors excel in detecting neurotransmitters, anticancer drugs, and antibiotics. In contrast, cobalt oxide and copper oxide are particularly effective for anti‐inflammatory and analgesic drugs. Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide sensors demonstrate excellent stability and high sensitivity, making them suitable for clinical diagnostics and environmental monitoring. This review also discusses these sensors' linear range, detection limits, and practical applications in various therapeutic categories. Despite the promising results, challenges remain, such as enhancing sensor selectivity, reducing interference, and improving stability and reproducibility over time. Future advancements in nanocomposite materials and portable sensor technologies hold great potential for the widespread application of MO x ‐based electrochemical sensors in real‐time drug monitoring.

Journal of the Chinese Chemical SocietyVol. 72(12)
Jain University (IN), University of Babylon (IQ), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), University of Anbar (IQ), University of Al Maarif (IQ), Iraqi University (IQ), Al-Nisour University College (IQ), King George Hospital (IN), Mazaya University College, Al Baha University (SA), Chitkara University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.