An Observational Study of Discourse Tasks and Running Speech Sampling in the Assessment of Paediatric Voice Quality

What is already known on this subject Perceptual evaluation of voice quality poses challenges, particularly in the paediatric population. A running speech sample is an essential component in order to provide a representative sample of an individual's voice quality outside the clinic setting. Current sampling practices are non-standardized and may not be appropriate for all children, especially those with reading and/or language difficulties. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study presents data comparing the voice quality of children, elicited using current reference standard tasks and narrative sampling tasks. Such tasks are more commonly used in the evaluation of language abilities, but could illustrate a way in which a clinician could elicit a sufficiently long, ecologically valid, running speech sample for perceptual voice evaluation. In addition, the sample could be analysed as a screener of language skills. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? While this study could be considered exploratory, it is possible that using narrative elicitation techniques in paediatric voice evaluations could yield sufficiently long units of speech that are representative of a child's everyday speaking voice. Such practices would add valuable information regarding language skills to the evaluation process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.70132
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Observational Study of Discourse Tasks and Running Speech Sampling in the Assessment of Paediatric Voice Quality

Simon Cheung Scanlon, Victoria Reynolds, Kristin Scavo‐Smith, Kate Oteng‐Bediako
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

An Observational Study of Discourse Tasks and Running Speech Sampling in the Assessment of Paediatric Voice Quality

Simon Cheung Scanlon, Victoria Reynolds, Kristin Scavo‐Smith, Kate Oteng‐Bediako
article en

Abstract

What is already known on this subject Perceptual evaluation of voice quality poses challenges, particularly in the paediatric population. A running speech sample is an essential component in order to provide a representative sample of an individual's voice quality outside the clinic setting. Current sampling practices are non-standardized and may not be appropriate for all children, especially those with reading and/or language difficulties. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study presents data comparing the voice quality of children, elicited using current reference standard tasks and narrative sampling tasks. Such tasks are more commonly used in the evaluation of language abilities, but could illustrate a way in which a clinician could elicit a sufficiently long, ecologically valid, running speech sample for perceptual voice evaluation. In addition, the sample could be analysed as a screener of language skills. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? While this study could be considered exploratory, it is possible that using narrative elicitation techniques in paediatric voice evaluations could yield sufficiently long units of speech that are representative of a child's everyday speaking voice. Such practices would add valuable information regarding language skills to the evaluation process.

International Journal of Language & Communication DisordersVol. 60(6)
Lewis University (US), Regis Technologies (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.