Framing the Marginalised: An Analysis of Themes in History and Sociology Book Reviews

Adopting a quantitative and corpus-based methodology, the present research examines the framing of the minority-related themes in academic book reviews in History and Sociology. Two corpora of book reviews (1,000 reviews in total, 500 for each discipline) from 2000 to 2024 were compiled and utilised for data analysis purposes. A theory- and data-driven keyword taxonomy, consisting of seven main themes and 27 keywords, emerged from the literature review, concordance analysis and expert validation. Keyword frequencies were generated, normalised, and transformed into a comparison using AntConc software. Inferential statistics such as Chi-square, Z-test, and hierarchical clustering methods were used to find out significant differences and thematic clusters of keywords in disciplines. Findings show strong disciplinary leanings: reviews in history are much more likely to discuss themes such as “native” and “indigenous”, which is consistent with historical understandings of ethnicity and marginalisation. In contrast, Sociology reviews foreground contemporary and intersecting concerns, frequently employing keywords such as “queer”, “gender” and “racialised”. This lexical pattern reflects a critically engaged stance, highlighting the discipline’s active negotiation of identity, diversity, and social justice in current scholarly debates. These findings demonstrate how book reviews both reproduce and produce disciplinarity, providing important indications toward knowledge dissemination and minority discourse. The methodology exemplifies that thematic patterns can be recognised using corpus-based and statistical analyses. It has significant implications for diversity efforts, disciplinary pedagogy and corpus-based research beyond and including academic discourse analysis, providing insight into the more general disciplinary involvement in marginalisation. Keywords : minority-related themes; corpus-based; quantitative; book reviews; History and Sociology

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2025-3103-29
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing the Marginalised: An Analysis of Themes in History and Sociology Book Reviews

Leng Hong Ang, Mengyu He
3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
article

Framing the Marginalised: An Analysis of Themes in History and Sociology Book Reviews

Leng Hong Ang, Mengyu He
article en

Abstract

Adopting a quantitative and corpus-based methodology, the present research examines the framing of the minority-related themes in academic book reviews in History and Sociology. Two corpora of book reviews (1,000 reviews in total, 500 for each discipline) from 2000 to 2024 were compiled and utilised for data analysis purposes. A theory- and data-driven keyword taxonomy, consisting of seven main themes and 27 keywords, emerged from the literature review, concordance analysis and expert validation. Keyword frequencies were generated, normalised, and transformed into a comparison using AntConc software. Inferential statistics such as Chi-square, Z-test, and hierarchical clustering methods were used to find out significant differences and thematic clusters of keywords in disciplines. Findings show strong disciplinary leanings: reviews in history are much more likely to discuss themes such as “native” and “indigenous”, which is consistent with historical understandings of ethnicity and marginalisation. In contrast, Sociology reviews foreground contemporary and intersecting concerns, frequently employing keywords such as “queer”, “gender” and “racialised”. This lexical pattern reflects a critically engaged stance, highlighting the discipline’s active negotiation of identity, diversity, and social justice in current scholarly debates. These findings demonstrate how book reviews both reproduce and produce disciplinarity, providing important indications toward knowledge dissemination and minority discourse. The methodology exemplifies that thematic patterns can be recognised using corpus-based and statistical analyses. It has significant implications for diversity efforts, disciplinary pedagogy and corpus-based research beyond and including academic discourse analysis, providing insight into the more general disciplinary involvement in marginalisation. Keywords : minority-related themes; corpus-based; quantitative; book reviews; History and Sociology

3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language StudiesVol. 31(3)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Hubei University Of Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.