Exploring the usability and perceived benefits and barriers of portable lift assist devices among paramedic workers

Patient lifting can expose health care workers to musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk factors. Portable lift assist devices may reduce exposure during lifting, however limited evidence on user feedback and efficacy is available to inform purchase decisions. Therefore, we tested the efficacy of two portable lift assist devices relative to a manual lift when lifting an individual from the floor. Participants lifted an actor from the floor using a manual technique and by using two lift assist devices, either an inflatable bladder or a mechanical device. Ratings of perceived exertion demonstrated that the lift assist devices decreased or maintained perceived exertion relative to the manual lift. Semi-structured interviews provided context where perceived benefits of the devices (i.e., decreased exertion and MSD risk) outweighed barriers (i.e., added time to call). The results of this study can inform stakeholders making decisions about lift assist devices purchases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ergonomics
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104651
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the usability and perceived benefits and barriers of portable lift assist devices among paramedic workers

Taylor W. Cleworth, Andrew C. Laing, Richard Ferron, Steven L. Fischer et al.
Applied Ergonomics
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Exploring the usability and perceived benefits and barriers of portable lift assist devices among paramedic workers

Taylor W. Cleworth, Andrew C. Laing, Richard Ferron, Steven L. Fischer, Daphne C. Ho, Hailey M Nestor, Amanda M Calford
article en

Abstract

Patient lifting can expose health care workers to musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk factors. Portable lift assist devices may reduce exposure during lifting, however limited evidence on user feedback and efficacy is available to inform purchase decisions. Therefore, we tested the efficacy of two portable lift assist devices relative to a manual lift when lifting an individual from the floor. Participants lifted an actor from the floor using a manual technique and by using two lift assist devices, either an inflatable bladder or a mechanical device. Ratings of perceived exertion demonstrated that the lift assist devices decreased or maintained perceived exertion relative to the manual lift. Semi-structured interviews provided context where perceived benefits of the devices (i.e., decreased exertion and MSD risk) outweighed barriers (i.e., added time to call). The results of this study can inform stakeholders making decisions about lift assist devices purchases.

Applied ErgonomicsVol. 130
University of Waterloo (CA), York University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the usability and perceived benefits and barriers of portable lift assist devices among paramedic workers — Taylor W. Cleworth, Andrew C. Laing, et al. · Applied Ergonomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS