A prospective study on outcome of dorsal versus ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture

Background: In urological practice, urethral stricture disease is a prevalent condition. In comparison to the other sites, the bulbar urethral stricture imposes a greater load. The buccal mucosal graft (BMG) has been considered an optimal kind of urethral replacement since 1941. A lifetime success rate of 92% is achieved with standard bulbar urethroplasty employing BMG. There exist several methodologies for BMG urethroplasty, namely dorsal, ventral, and lateral approaches, which depend on the discretion of the surgeon. Methods: An observational study was done among 40 patients, divided into two groups each based on the procedure done. Age more than 18 years who are fit for the procedure, stricture length more than 2 cm on retrograde urethrogram (RGU) and patients who were willing to give informed consent were included in the study. Post operatively, all the patients were assessed at every 3-month interval up-to 18 months. The outcome parameters noticed were post voidal residual (PVR), Qmax, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) score. Results: There was no difference between the pre-operative and post-operative Qmax, PVR, IPSS score between the study groups. Conclusions: The findings of the present study concluded that there is no difference between dorsal and ventral onlay BMG urethroplasty in terms of increase in Qmax and decrease in PVR at the end of study period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253142
Primary Topic
Urological Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective study on outcome of dorsal versus ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture

Y. Yuvaraju, Jafar Sadik Shaik, Atul Gupta, PAmaresh Reddy et al.
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Urological Disorders and Treatments
article

A prospective study on outcome of dorsal versus ventral buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture

Y. Yuvaraju, Jafar Sadik Shaik, Atul Gupta, PAmaresh Reddy, Mani Ramesh, Gandi Yaswanth
article en

Abstract

Background: In urological practice, urethral stricture disease is a prevalent condition. In comparison to the other sites, the bulbar urethral stricture imposes a greater load. The buccal mucosal graft (BMG) has been considered an optimal kind of urethral replacement since 1941. A lifetime success rate of 92% is achieved with standard bulbar urethroplasty employing BMG. There exist several methodologies for BMG urethroplasty, namely dorsal, ventral, and lateral approaches, which depend on the discretion of the surgeon. Methods: An observational study was done among 40 patients, divided into two groups each based on the procedure done. Age more than 18 years who are fit for the procedure, stricture length more than 2 cm on retrograde urethrogram (RGU) and patients who were willing to give informed consent were included in the study. Post operatively, all the patients were assessed at every 3-month interval up-to 18 months. The outcome parameters noticed were post voidal residual (PVR), Qmax, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) score. Results: There was no difference between the pre-operative and post-operative Qmax, PVR, IPSS score between the study groups. Conclusions: The findings of the present study concluded that there is no difference between dorsal and ventral onlay BMG urethroplasty in terms of increase in Qmax and decrease in PVR at the end of study period.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 13(10)
Narayana Dental College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Urological Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.