Assessment of adverse drug reactions and intravenous incompatibilities in a tertiary care teaching hospital

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and intravenous (i.v.) incompatibilities are significant concerns in clinical practice due to their potential to compromise patient safety and treatment efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, types, and consequences of ADRs and i.v. incompatibilities in prescriptions from tertiary care hospitals. The study also aimed to identify the most frequently implicated drugs and conditions associated with these issues and suggest recommendations for improving prescribing practices. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over one year in a tertiary care hospital. Data were collected from 1000 patients across various age groups and genders in tertiary care settings. Detailed demographic information, prescribing patterns of high-risk medications, department-specific distribution, i.v. incompatibilities, and specific ADRs were analyzed. The assessment criteria included adherence to STGs, identification of deviations, and analysis of potential consequences. Results: The study revealed a significant prevalence of unacceptable deviations from standard treatment guidelines, particularly with medications such as pantoprazole and rabeprazole with domperidone. High-risk medications like anticoagulants, antiplatelets, insulin, chemotherapeutic agents, opioids, and corticosteroids were frequently prescribed, with notable department-specific variations. I.v. incompatibilities were common with chemotherapeutic agents and insulin, while specific ADRs were associated with chemotherapeutic agents, insulin, anticoagulants, and corticosteroids. Conclusions: The findings highlight the need for improved prescribing practices and strict adherence to guidelines, especially for high-risk medications. Implementation of targeted interventions, enhanced training for healthcare providers, utilization of electronic systems, robust pharmacovigilance programs, patient education, and department-specific protocols are recommended to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes in tertiary care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20253151
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of adverse drug reactions and intravenous incompatibilities in a tertiary care teaching hospital

C. D. Shakthivel, Janane Murugesan
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Assessment of adverse drug reactions and intravenous incompatibilities in a tertiary care teaching hospital

C. D. Shakthivel, Janane Murugesan
article en

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and intravenous (i.v.) incompatibilities are significant concerns in clinical practice due to their potential to compromise patient safety and treatment efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, types, and consequences of ADRs and i.v. incompatibilities in prescriptions from tertiary care hospitals. The study also aimed to identify the most frequently implicated drugs and conditions associated with these issues and suggest recommendations for improving prescribing practices. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over one year in a tertiary care hospital. Data were collected from 1000 patients across various age groups and genders in tertiary care settings. Detailed demographic information, prescribing patterns of high-risk medications, department-specific distribution, i.v. incompatibilities, and specific ADRs were analyzed. The assessment criteria included adherence to STGs, identification of deviations, and analysis of potential consequences. Results: The study revealed a significant prevalence of unacceptable deviations from standard treatment guidelines, particularly with medications such as pantoprazole and rabeprazole with domperidone. High-risk medications like anticoagulants, antiplatelets, insulin, chemotherapeutic agents, opioids, and corticosteroids were frequently prescribed, with notable department-specific variations. I.v. incompatibilities were common with chemotherapeutic agents and insulin, while specific ADRs were associated with chemotherapeutic agents, insulin, anticoagulants, and corticosteroids. Conclusions: The findings highlight the need for improved prescribing practices and strict adherence to guidelines, especially for high-risk medications. Implementation of targeted interventions, enhanced training for healthcare providers, utilization of electronic systems, robust pharmacovigilance programs, patient education, and department-specific protocols are recommended to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes in tertiary care settings.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 13(10)
Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Paramedical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of adverse drug reactions and intravenous incompatibilities in a tertiary care teaching hospital — C. D. Shakthivel, Janane Murugesan · International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS