Artificial Intelligence Regulation from the Perspective of Trust

The rapid advance of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted all aspects of society. AI has rasied complex ethical and legal issues. These issues cannot be easily addressed under existing legal frameworks. In particular, the autonomous decision-making by AI often unpredictable and opaque — necessitate an appropriate level of regulatory oversight. Establishing public trust in AI is crucial for ensuring its ethical, economic, and social sustainability. Trust presupposes knowledge of, or the ability to know, the subject to be trusted. However, where a high degree of technical expertise is required or an imbalance of information exists, verification by credible public institutions may play a key role in facilitating trust. Another essential element in building trust is the availability of effective remedies in cases of harm. Accordingly, regulatory obligations such as transparency, explainability, ex ante impact assessments, and human oversight are increasingly emphasized. The EU has adopted the world’s first comprehensive regulation on AI, 「Artificial Intelligence Act」, which applies a risk-based approach by imposing stricter requirements on high-risk AI systems. These include risk management systems, transparency, and human oversight. Similarly, Korea's 「Framework Act on the Promotion of AI and Establishment of Trust」 follows a comparable structure but requires further elements for building trust. For example, while the Act includes provisions on the duty to explain AI algorithms, it lacks clarity on the required level of explanation and does not provide specific sanctions for non-compliance. To strengthen legal remedies for AI-related harm, further discussions are needed regarding the introduction of punitive damages, the activation of AI liability insurance schemes, and the lowering or reversal of the burden of proof. These measures can enhance the accountability of AI systems and contribute to building public trust in AI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Legal Studies Institute of Chosun University
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18189/isicu.2025.32.2.109
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Regulation from the Perspective of Trust

Jehee Lee
The Legal Studies Institute of Chosun University
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence Regulation from the Perspective of Trust

Jehee Lee
article en

Abstract

The rapid advance of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted all aspects of society. AI has rasied complex ethical and legal issues. These issues cannot be easily addressed under existing legal frameworks. In particular, the autonomous decision-making by AI often unpredictable and opaque — necessitate an appropriate level of regulatory oversight. Establishing public trust in AI is crucial for ensuring its ethical, economic, and social sustainability. Trust presupposes knowledge of, or the ability to know, the subject to be trusted. However, where a high degree of technical expertise is required or an imbalance of information exists, verification by credible public institutions may play a key role in facilitating trust. Another essential element in building trust is the availability of effective remedies in cases of harm. Accordingly, regulatory obligations such as transparency, explainability, ex ante impact assessments, and human oversight are increasingly emphasized. The EU has adopted the world’s first comprehensive regulation on AI, 「Artificial Intelligence Act」, which applies a risk-based approach by imposing stricter requirements on high-risk AI systems. These include risk management systems, transparency, and human oversight. Similarly, Korea's 「Framework Act on the Promotion of AI and Establishment of Trust」 follows a comparable structure but requires further elements for building trust. For example, while the Act includes provisions on the duty to explain AI algorithms, it lacks clarity on the required level of explanation and does not provide specific sanctions for non-compliance. To strengthen legal remedies for AI-related harm, further discussions are needed regarding the introduction of punitive damages, the activation of AI liability insurance schemes, and the lowering or reversal of the burden of proof. These measures can enhance the accountability of AI systems and contribute to building public trust in AI.

The Legal Studies Institute of Chosun UniversityVol. 32(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence Regulation from the Perspective of Trust — Jehee Lee · The Legal Studies Institute of Chosun University (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS