Media Representation of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood in Arab and Western Outlets: A Critical Discourse Analysis

This study examines the contrasting media coverage of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood to uncover the ideological underpinnings of the accounts presented by Al-Jazeera and CNN. It examines how the two leading media outlets report the same event from essentially contradictory viewpoints, thereby mirroring wider geopolitical divides. The study compares the narratives and examines the ideological parameters which shape the conflict reporting. It also employs Fairclough’s three- dimensional approach to conduct a textual, discursive and sociocultural analysis of the context embedded in media reporting. Besides, the study conducts a qualitative content analysis of Al-Jazeera and CNN news reports and evaluates the narratives to explain the differences in the representation and inherent bias. The study design employs qualitative content analysis of broadcast news reports released by both Al-Jazeera and CNN, as well as a comparative evaluation of the narratives to explain variations in representations and inherent biases. The findings show that CNN reporting is characterized by violence- and hostility-focused language that frames the event as a legitimate use of force. However, Al-Jazeera’s coverage places the emphasis on the themes of liberation and resistance. CNN’s ideological bias reflects the Western geopolitical interests and Israeli sympathies, while Palestinian actions are discursively constructed as terrorist acts. By contrast, Al-Jazeera's narratives are congruent with the Middle Eastern perspectives and represent the operation as both a battle against occupation and a struggle for Palestinian independence. The study highlights the significance of media literacy in fostering critically engaged news media consumption and calls for more balanced perspectives in news coverage on international conflicts. It also underscores the value of employing diverse analytical approaches to deepen understanding of media representations in conflict contexts, thereby expanding on existing research in this particular field. Keywords: Media representation; ideological framing; Israeli-Palestinian conflict; narrative analysis; critical discourse analysis

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2025-3103-21
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Media Representation of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood in Arab and Western Outlets: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Awham Rashid Mohammed, Ashinida Aladdin, Azianura Hani Shaari
3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Media Representation of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood in Arab and Western Outlets: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Awham Rashid Mohammed, Ashinida Aladdin, Azianura Hani Shaari
article en

Abstract

This study examines the contrasting media coverage of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood to uncover the ideological underpinnings of the accounts presented by Al-Jazeera and CNN. It examines how the two leading media outlets report the same event from essentially contradictory viewpoints, thereby mirroring wider geopolitical divides. The study compares the narratives and examines the ideological parameters which shape the conflict reporting. It also employs Fairclough’s three- dimensional approach to conduct a textual, discursive and sociocultural analysis of the context embedded in media reporting. Besides, the study conducts a qualitative content analysis of Al-Jazeera and CNN news reports and evaluates the narratives to explain the differences in the representation and inherent bias. The study design employs qualitative content analysis of broadcast news reports released by both Al-Jazeera and CNN, as well as a comparative evaluation of the narratives to explain variations in representations and inherent biases. The findings show that CNN reporting is characterized by violence- and hostility-focused language that frames the event as a legitimate use of force. However, Al-Jazeera’s coverage places the emphasis on the themes of liberation and resistance. CNN’s ideological bias reflects the Western geopolitical interests and Israeli sympathies, while Palestinian actions are discursively constructed as terrorist acts. By contrast, Al-Jazeera's narratives are congruent with the Middle Eastern perspectives and represent the operation as both a battle against occupation and a struggle for Palestinian independence. The study highlights the significance of media literacy in fostering critically engaged news media consumption and calls for more balanced perspectives in news coverage on international conflicts. It also underscores the value of employing diverse analytical approaches to deepen understanding of media representations in conflict contexts, thereby expanding on existing research in this particular field. Keywords: Media representation; ideological framing; Israeli-Palestinian conflict; narrative analysis; critical discourse analysis

3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language StudiesVol. 31(3)
University of Anbar (IQ), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.