Genetic differences between diagnosed and undiagnosed Celiac disease: a population-based study

A large proportion of individuals with celiac disease (CeD) remain undiagnosed, often presenting at an older age of onset or with non-classical symptoms compared to diagnosed cases. Such heterogeneity might be related to genetic factors. The aim was to utilize a CeD-screened adult population to compare the genetic variants in known and newly diagnosed cases. In the fourth wave of the population-based Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) 826 CeD and 51,516 non-CeD individuals were included. Medical registries identified 361 previously diagnosed cases, while screening identified 465 new cases. A validated polygenic risk score (PRS) was used to assess the genetic risk of CeD among the two case groups versus non-CeD individuals. Additional genetic variants not included in the PRS were also analyzed. The PRS distinguished cases from non-cases with high accuracy (AUROC: 85% for known cases, 83% for new cases). The genetic variation explained by the PRS was similar for known and new cases (17.1% versus 14.5%). The odds ratio for being in the highest genetic risk group (top 10%) was 22.7 (95% CI 14.1-36.4) for known cases and 18.6 (95% CI 12.4-27.9) for new cases versus the median group (40%-60%). Differences in effect size among specific genome-wide variants were observed but were not significantly associated with CeD. A validated PRS showed significant genetic difference between CeD cases and the general population, with similar association in both known and newly diagnosed cases. This suggests that genetic architectures of the two groups are comparable, implying that other non-genetic factors may drive CeD in adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Genetics
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-025-02778-2
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic differences between diagnosed and undiagnosed Celiac disease: a population-based study

Iris H. Jonkers, Sebo Withoff, Knut E. A. Lundin, Rebecka Hjort et al.
Human Genetics
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

Genetic differences between diagnosed and undiagnosed Celiac disease: a population-based study

Iris H. Jonkers, Sebo Withoff, Knut E. A. Lundin, Rebecka Hjort, Kristian Hveem, Eivind Ness‐Jensen, Ludvig M. Sollid, Brooke N. Wolford, M. Alam
article en

Abstract

A large proportion of individuals with celiac disease (CeD) remain undiagnosed, often presenting at an older age of onset or with non-classical symptoms compared to diagnosed cases. Such heterogeneity might be related to genetic factors. The aim was to utilize a CeD-screened adult population to compare the genetic variants in known and newly diagnosed cases. In the fourth wave of the population-based Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4) 826 CeD and 51,516 non-CeD individuals were included. Medical registries identified 361 previously diagnosed cases, while screening identified 465 new cases. A validated polygenic risk score (PRS) was used to assess the genetic risk of CeD among the two case groups versus non-CeD individuals. Additional genetic variants not included in the PRS were also analyzed. The PRS distinguished cases from non-cases with high accuracy (AUROC: 85% for known cases, 83% for new cases). The genetic variation explained by the PRS was similar for known and new cases (17.1% versus 14.5%). The odds ratio for being in the highest genetic risk group (top 10%) was 22.7 (95% CI 14.1-36.4) for known cases and 18.6 (95% CI 12.4-27.9) for new cases versus the median group (40%-60%). Differences in effect size among specific genome-wide variants were observed but were not significantly associated with CeD. A validated PRS showed significant genetic difference between CeD cases and the general population, with similar association in both known and newly diagnosed cases. This suggests that genetic architectures of the two groups are comparable, implying that other non-genetic factors may drive CeD in adults.

Human GeneticsVol. 144(11-12)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University of Groningen (NL), University of Oslo (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Levanger Hospital (NO), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Helse Midt-Norge, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.