Replies to Critics
There are three prevalent themes among the critics. First, a call to advance the concept of social power by expanding on structural power and demonstrating how telic power can be operationalized. Second, the critics want a stronger objection to the collective intentionality claim (assumed by the standard model). Third, there is a need to clarify the concept of opaque kinds of social facts, especially in relation to economic class. I integrate Khalidi’s clarification of opaqueness, elaborate on the concept of economic class, and introduce a new development of the power view by operationalizing telic power through an empirical case study.
Authors
- Åsa Burman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8232-1363)
Institutions
- Stockholm University (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Philosophy of the Social Sciences
- Published
- 2025-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931251380496
- Primary Topic
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00