Mixed-method evaluation of the Fairer Futures Fund: a £22.2 m public health initiative designed to reduce health inequalities in Birmingham and Solihull (UK)

The amount invested, the innovative nature of the funding allocation, and the visibility of the FFF programme warrants this detailed and objective evaluation by experienced researchers and evaluators. To support the success of the FFF, the work will provide both formative and summative findings. Although the precise content and structure of each project is determined by the local communities and collaborating organisations, consistent data collection is supported by the requisite use of a combination of preselected and validated survey tools. This will allow for the collation of larger and comparable data across similar projects. The quantitative data outputs will be contextualised by qualitative data synthesised across work packages using the implementation framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1658646
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed-method evaluation of the Fairer Futures Fund: a £22.2 m public health initiative designed to reduce health inequalities in Birmingham and Solihull (UK)

Ian Litchfield, W. Andy Knight, Lorraine Harper, Rebecca Howell‐Jones et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Mixed-method evaluation of the Fairer Futures Fund: a £22.2 m public health initiative designed to reduce health inequalities in Birmingham and Solihull (UK)

Ian Litchfield, W. Andy Knight, Lorraine Harper, Rebecca Howell‐Jones, David Miller, Mike Walsh, Zoe Sweeney
article en

Abstract

The amount invested, the innovative nature of the funding allocation, and the visibility of the FFF programme warrants this detailed and objective evaluation by experienced researchers and evaluators. To support the success of the FFF, the work will provide both formative and summative findings. Although the precise content and structure of each project is determined by the local communities and collaborating organisations, consistent data collection is supported by the requisite use of a combination of preselected and validated survey tools. This will allow for the collation of larger and comparable data across similar projects. The quantitative data outputs will be contextualised by qualitative data synthesised across work packages using the implementation framework.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Birmingham City Council (GB), Kings Health Partners (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.