Comparing the Architectures of Multiplanet Systems from Kepler, K2, and TESS Data

Exoplanet surveys like Kepler, TESS, and K2 have shown that planetary systems are common in our galaxy. These surveys, along with several others, have identified thousands of planetary candidates, with more than five thousand having already been confirmed. Many of these planetary systems host multiple planets. As we discover more multiplanet systems, notable trends begin to appear in the data. We use kernel density estimation (KDE) to analyze the period ratios of adjacent planet pairs in multiplanet systems in the most recent Kepler, TESS and K2 data, paying particular attention to pairs in first order mean motion resonance (MMR). We compare a recent Kepler catalog with the DR25 data release. We also compare TESS and K2 against this recently released Kepler data. To verify the significance of our findings against selection bias, we perform Monte Carlo simulations of multiplanet systems in the TESS catalog, finding an excess of planet pairs near the 2 (2:1), and 1.5 (3:2) period ratios, both exceeding the 99% confidence interval. We also find a significant peak at the 2.19 period ratio, which exceeds the 90% confidence interval. Using a lower limit for period ratios determined by the period of the inner planet proposed in J. H. Steffen & W. M. Farr (2013), we identify two planet pairs orbiting M dwarf stars in a very tight ratio. We also note a likely misidentified planet pair orbiting an FGK type star, which if further study proves to be true, would indicate that only planets orbiting M dwarf stars may violate this limit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.144936
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Architectures of Multiplanet Systems from Kepler, K2, and TESS Data

Jason H. Steffen, R. Royer
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Comparing the Architectures of Multiplanet Systems from Kepler, K2, and TESS Data

Jason H. Steffen, R. Royer
article en

Abstract

Exoplanet surveys like Kepler, TESS, and K2 have shown that planetary systems are common in our galaxy. These surveys, along with several others, have identified thousands of planetary candidates, with more than five thousand having already been confirmed. Many of these planetary systems host multiple planets. As we discover more multiplanet systems, notable trends begin to appear in the data. We use kernel density estimation (KDE) to analyze the period ratios of adjacent planet pairs in multiplanet systems in the most recent Kepler, TESS and K2 data, paying particular attention to pairs in first order mean motion resonance (MMR). We compare a recent Kepler catalog with the DR25 data release. We also compare TESS and K2 against this recently released Kepler data. To verify the significance of our findings against selection bias, we perform Monte Carlo simulations of multiplanet systems in the TESS catalog, finding an excess of planet pairs near the 2 (2:1), and 1.5 (3:2) period ratios, both exceeding the 99% confidence interval. We also find a significant peak at the 2.19 period ratio, which exceeds the 90% confidence interval. Using a lower limit for period ratios determined by the period of the inner planet proposed in J. H. Steffen & W. M. Farr (2013), we identify two planet pairs orbiting M dwarf stars in a very tight ratio. We also note a likely misidentified planet pair orbiting an FGK type star, which if further study proves to be true, would indicate that only planets orbiting M dwarf stars may violate this limit.

The Open Journal of AstrophysicsVol. 8
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), ORCID (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.