Values, worldviews and historicity. Revisiting Weber’s theory of values

This article revisits Max Weber’s theory of values by focussing on the often-overlooked concept of ‘worldview’ ( Weltanschauung ). By exploring Weber’s distinction between reason, decision and historical context, this study shows the role of worldviews in shaping and creating values. In doing so, it proves that Weber’s approach to values is more nuanced and complex than the so-called reason-value dichotomy and voluntarism, as it seeks to make sense of how collective cultural frameworks contribute to individuals’ practical and ethical life (Section 1). The article also addresses Weber’s famous claim of an antagonism of values, contrasting it with competing views such as relativism and universal values systems. It argues that this claim is best understood in light of Weber’s metatheoretical reflections on the difference between empirical-descriptive and speculative-interpretative analysis (Section 2).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537251377680
Primary Topic
Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Values, worldviews and historicity. Revisiting Weber’s theory of values

Rosario Croce
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
article

Values, worldviews and historicity. Revisiting Weber’s theory of values

Rosario Croce
article en

Abstract

This article revisits Max Weber’s theory of values by focussing on the often-overlooked concept of ‘worldview’ ( Weltanschauung ). By exploring Weber’s distinction between reason, decision and historical context, this study shows the role of worldviews in shaping and creating values. In doing so, it proves that Weber’s approach to values is more nuanced and complex than the so-called reason-value dichotomy and voluntarism, as it seeks to make sense of how collective cultural frameworks contribute to individuals’ practical and ethical life (Section 1). The article also addresses Weber’s famous claim of an antagonism of values, contrasting it with competing views such as relativism and universal values systems. It argues that this claim is best understood in light of Weber’s metatheoretical reflections on the difference between empirical-descriptive and speculative-interpretative analysis (Section 2).

Philosophy & Social Criticism
Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.