Community Practices and Relationship-Making in a Korean-Chinese Rural Village: Focusing on the Reconfiguration of Social Relations in Village A after the Land Transfer Policy

This study anthropologically analyzes how the implementation of China's land rights policy has influenced labor exchange practices, land leasing, power restructuring, and class stratification within an ethnic Korean (Joseonjok) rural village in Jilin Province. Drawing on seven months of fieldwork conducted in 2013, the researcher closely observed the labor practices, norms of reciprocity, modes of power exercised by village officials, and the interactions and tensions between cultivating and non-cultivating households. The findings reveal that village committee cadres, led by the village secretary, have effectively monopolized land management, state subsidies, and the mobilization of labor, thereby consolidating their power and evolving into a dominant economic interest group. Meanwhile, traditional forms of reciprocal labor exchange have lost their former egalitarian and mutual character, transforming into asymmetrical relationships imbued with power and hierarchy. Large-scale landholders (大戶) benefit most from labor exchange, while non-cultivating households-those who have ceased farming due to age, illness, or employment in South Korea-are increasingly excluded from reciprocal labor networks, despite still holding land-use rights. This study demonstrates how a national policy-China's land transfer system-has been locally distorted and entangled with everyday power structures to deepen class divisions. Furthermore, it reveals how the communal ideal of “reciprocity” functions as a mechanism for reproducing power, and how silence and emotional management in rural life serve as key instruments for maintaining unequal social orders.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Institute of Korean Cultural Studies Yeungnam University
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15186/ikc.2025.8.31.14
Primary Topic
Korean Urban and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community Practices and Relationship-Making in a Korean-Chinese Rural Village: Focusing on the Reconfiguration of Social Relations in Village A after the Land Transfer Policy

Yeonghui Ryu
Institute of Korean Cultural Studies Yeungnam University
Korean Urban and Social Studies
article

Community Practices and Relationship-Making in a Korean-Chinese Rural Village: Focusing on the Reconfiguration of Social Relations in Village A after the Land Transfer Policy

Yeonghui Ryu
article en

Abstract

This study anthropologically analyzes how the implementation of China's land rights policy has influenced labor exchange practices, land leasing, power restructuring, and class stratification within an ethnic Korean (Joseonjok) rural village in Jilin Province. Drawing on seven months of fieldwork conducted in 2013, the researcher closely observed the labor practices, norms of reciprocity, modes of power exercised by village officials, and the interactions and tensions between cultivating and non-cultivating households. The findings reveal that village committee cadres, led by the village secretary, have effectively monopolized land management, state subsidies, and the mobilization of labor, thereby consolidating their power and evolving into a dominant economic interest group. Meanwhile, traditional forms of reciprocal labor exchange have lost their former egalitarian and mutual character, transforming into asymmetrical relationships imbued with power and hierarchy. Large-scale landholders (大戶) benefit most from labor exchange, while non-cultivating households-those who have ceased farming due to age, illness, or employment in South Korea-are increasingly excluded from reciprocal labor networks, despite still holding land-use rights. This study demonstrates how a national policy-China's land transfer system-has been locally distorted and entangled with everyday power structures to deepen class divisions. Furthermore, it reveals how the communal ideal of “reciprocity” functions as a mechanism for reproducing power, and how silence and emotional management in rural life serve as key instruments for maintaining unequal social orders.

Institute of Korean Cultural Studies Yeungnam UniversityVol. 90
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Korean Urban and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.