The Analysis of Transient Drilling Fluid Loss in Coupled Drill Pipe-Wellbore-Fracture System of Deep Fractured Reservoirs

Drilling fluid loss is a common and complex downhole problem that occurs during drilling in deep fractured formations, which has a significant negative impact on the exploration and development of oil and gas resources. Establishing a drilling fluid loss model for the quantitative analysis of drilling fluid loss is the most effective method for the diagnosis of drilling fluid loss, which provides a favorable basis for the formulation of drilling fluid loss control measures, including the information on thief zone location, loss type, and the size of loss channels. The previous loss model assumes that the drilling fluid is driven by constant flow or pressure at the fracture inlet. However, drilling fluid loss is a complex physical process in the coupled wellbore circulation system. The lost drilling fluid is driven by dynamic bottomhole pressure (BHP) during the drilling process. The use of a single-phase model to describe drilling fluids ignores the influence of solid-phase particles in the drilling fluid system on its rheological properties. This paper aims to model drilling fluid loss in the coupled wellbore–-fracture system based on the two-phase flow model. It focuses on the effects of well depth, drilling pumping rate, drilling fluid density, viscosity, fracture geometric parameters, and their morphology on loss during the drilling fluid circulation process. Numerical discrete equations are derived using the finite volume method and the “upwind” scheme. The correctness of the model is verified by published literature data and experimental data. The results show that the loss model without considering the circulation of drilling fluid underestimates the extent of drilling fluid loss. The presence of annular pressure loss in the circulation of drilling fluid will lead to an increase in BHP, resulting in more serious loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103100
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Analysis of Transient Drilling Fluid Loss in Coupled Drill Pipe-Wellbore-Fracture System of Deep Fractured Reservoirs

Chengyuan Xu, X.Q. Wang, Yili Kang, Zhichao Xie et al.
1 citations
Processes
Drilling and Well Engineering
1.15
article

The Analysis of Transient Drilling Fluid Loss in Coupled Drill Pipe-Wellbore-Fracture System of Deep Fractured Reservoirs

Chengyuan Xu, X.Q. Wang, Yili Kang, Zhichao Xie, Chong Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Drilling fluid loss is a common and complex downhole problem that occurs during drilling in deep fractured formations, which has a significant negative impact on the exploration and development of oil and gas resources. Establishing a drilling fluid loss model for the quantitative analysis of drilling fluid loss is the most effective method for the diagnosis of drilling fluid loss, which provides a favorable basis for the formulation of drilling fluid loss control measures, including the information on thief zone location, loss type, and the size of loss channels. The previous loss model assumes that the drilling fluid is driven by constant flow or pressure at the fracture inlet. However, drilling fluid loss is a complex physical process in the coupled wellbore circulation system. The lost drilling fluid is driven by dynamic bottomhole pressure (BHP) during the drilling process. The use of a single-phase model to describe drilling fluids ignores the influence of solid-phase particles in the drilling fluid system on its rheological properties. This paper aims to model drilling fluid loss in the coupled wellbore–-fracture system based on the two-phase flow model. It focuses on the effects of well depth, drilling pumping rate, drilling fluid density, viscosity, fracture geometric parameters, and their morphology on loss during the drilling fluid circulation process. Numerical discrete equations are derived using the finite volume method and the “upwind” scheme. The correctness of the model is verified by published literature data and experimental data. The results show that the loss model without considering the circulation of drilling fluid underestimates the extent of drilling fluid loss. The presence of annular pressure loss in the circulation of drilling fluid will lead to an increase in BHP, resulting in more serious loss.

ProcessesVol. 13(10)
Southwest Petroleum University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Drilling and Well Engineering
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.