The impact of speech rate on first- and second-stage prediction in L1 and L2 speakers

Abstract We investigate timing and eye-movement behavior during semantic prediction in L1 and L2 speakers of English using the Visual World Paradigm, additionally exploring speech rate. We differentiate first-stage predictions, considered to be automatic and relatively cost-free, from second-stage predictions, which are non-automatic and more cognitively demanding, with differences between L1 and L2 speakers believed to arise in second-stage predictions. We found no differences in the divergence of looks to the target in first- or second-stage predictions across groups. However, speech rate played an important role. Both L1 and L2 speakers showed similar first-stage predictions at slower speech rates, but L1 speakers showed earlier predictions as the speech rate increased. L2 speakers showed reduced and more variable second-stage predictions, suggesting they were impacted during the more demanding second-stage prediction. This may indicate a wait-and-see strategy to help reduce costs associated with second-stage prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728925100515
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of speech rate on first- and second-stage prediction in L1 and L2 speakers

Leigh B. Fernandez, John Gamboa, Lauren V. Hadley, Shanley Allen et al.
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

The impact of speech rate on first- and second-stage prediction in L1 and L2 speakers

Leigh B. Fernandez, John Gamboa, Lauren V. Hadley, Shanley Allen, Christopher Allison
article en

Abstract

Abstract We investigate timing and eye-movement behavior during semantic prediction in L1 and L2 speakers of English using the Visual World Paradigm, additionally exploring speech rate. We differentiate first-stage predictions, considered to be automatic and relatively cost-free, from second-stage predictions, which are non-automatic and more cognitively demanding, with differences between L1 and L2 speakers believed to arise in second-stage predictions. We found no differences in the divergence of looks to the target in first- or second-stage predictions across groups. However, speech rate played an important role. Both L1 and L2 speakers showed similar first-stage predictions at slower speech rates, but L1 speakers showed earlier predictions as the speech rate increased. L2 speakers showed reduced and more variable second-stage predictions, suggesting they were impacted during the more demanding second-stage prediction. This may indicate a wait-and-see strategy to help reduce costs associated with second-stage prediction.

Bilingualism Language and Cognition
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Kaiserslautern (DE), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of speech rate on first- and second-stage prediction in L1 and L2 speakers — Leigh B. Fernandez, John Gamboa, et al. · Bilingualism Language and Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS