Assessing the Reliability of 3D-Printed Custom Silicone Boluses in Radiotherapy: Thickness and Air Bubble Considerations

This study aimed to evaluate the scientific reliability of 3D-printed silicone boluses fabricated with patient-specific molds, focusing on fabrication-related uncertainties such as internal air bubbles, thickness variations, and density differences, thereby providing evidence for clinical quality assurance. Custom silicone boluses were fabricated using 3D-printed molds with varying vacuum degassing times (1, 5, and 10 min). Air bubble size and depth were quantified using scanner image analysis, while density and Hounsfield unit (HU) values were compared with a commercial bolus. Dosimetric evaluation was performed using a VitalBeam linear accelerator (6 MV photons, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and a MatriXX 2D detector (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany), comparing treatment planning system (TPS) calculated doses with measured doses across a 3 × 3 grid. Surface dose distributions were further analyzed using EBT3 film. Results showed that bubble size increased with longer vacuum times, interpreted as coalescence due to limited degassing and silicone viscosity. The density of 3D boluses ranged from 0.980 to 1.104 g/cm3 (commercial: 0.988 g/cm3), with HU values of +240 to +250 (commercial: −110). In point-wise comparisons, mean dose differences were less than 1% for 1- and 5 min samples and approximately 1% for 10 min, with all conditions within |Δ| ≤ 3%. Film analysis confirmed equivalent surface dose distributions. These findings demonstrate, for the first time, that microscopic bubbles in 3D-printed silicone boluses have negligible clinical impact, supporting their safe adoption without requiring complex degassing procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910486
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Reliability of 3D-Printed Custom Silicone Boluses in Radiotherapy: Thickness and Air Bubble Considerations

Myeongsoo Kim, Sang Jun Byun, Y. J. Shin, Byungyong Kim
Applied Sciences
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Assessing the Reliability of 3D-Printed Custom Silicone Boluses in Radiotherapy: Thickness and Air Bubble Considerations

Myeongsoo Kim, Sang Jun Byun, Y. J. Shin, Byungyong Kim
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the scientific reliability of 3D-printed silicone boluses fabricated with patient-specific molds, focusing on fabrication-related uncertainties such as internal air bubbles, thickness variations, and density differences, thereby providing evidence for clinical quality assurance. Custom silicone boluses were fabricated using 3D-printed molds with varying vacuum degassing times (1, 5, and 10 min). Air bubble size and depth were quantified using scanner image analysis, while density and Hounsfield unit (HU) values were compared with a commercial bolus. Dosimetric evaluation was performed using a VitalBeam linear accelerator (6 MV photons, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and a MatriXX 2D detector (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany), comparing treatment planning system (TPS) calculated doses with measured doses across a 3 × 3 grid. Surface dose distributions were further analyzed using EBT3 film. Results showed that bubble size increased with longer vacuum times, interpreted as coalescence due to limited degassing and silicone viscosity. The density of 3D boluses ranged from 0.980 to 1.104 g/cm3 (commercial: 0.988 g/cm3), with HU values of +240 to +250 (commercial: −110). In point-wise comparisons, mean dose differences were less than 1% for 1- and 5 min samples and approximately 1% for 10 min, with all conditions within |Δ| ≤ 3%. Film analysis confirmed equivalent surface dose distributions. These findings demonstrate, for the first time, that microscopic bubbles in 3D-printed silicone boluses have negligible clinical impact, supporting their safe adoption without requiring complex degassing procedures.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(19)
Keimyung University (KR)
Keimyung University
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.