LOINC implementation approaches in academic medical research centers – results from a survey of CTSA sites

Reference standards are vital for harmonizing heterogeneous clinical data for research, but little is known about their implementations or costs. We surveyed NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) hubs to assess operational dimensions of institutional implementation, maintenance, and use of the Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes (LOINC) standard. Respondents (<i>n</i> = 19,30%) exhibited substantial variability in approaches to implementation. Differences in number and training of staff and frequency of mapping updates make it difficult to estimate costs and comparability of data across sites. CTSA and other multi-site research can benefit from operational definitions and recommended processes for LOINC implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10151
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LOINC implementation approaches in academic medical research centers – results from a survey of CTSA sites

Boyd M. Knosp, David A. Hanauer, Thomas R. Campion, Rachel Richesson
1 citations
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
0.81
article

LOINC implementation approaches in academic medical research centers – results from a survey of CTSA sites

Boyd M. Knosp, David A. Hanauer, Thomas R. Campion, Rachel Richesson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reference standards are vital for harmonizing heterogeneous clinical data for research, but little is known about their implementations or costs. We surveyed NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) hubs to assess operational dimensions of institutional implementation, maintenance, and use of the Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes (LOINC) standard. Respondents (<i>n</i> = 19,30%) exhibited substantial variability in approaches to implementation. Differences in number and training of staff and frequency of mapping updates make it difficult to estimate costs and comparability of data across sites. CTSA and other multi-site research can benefit from operational definitions and recommended processes for LOINC implementation.

Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 9(1)
University of Iowa (US), Cornell University (US), University of Michigan (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

LOINC implementation approaches in academic medical research centers – results from a survey of CTSA sites — Boyd M. Knosp, David A. Hanauer, et al. · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS