Agent-Based Models of Sexual Selection in Bird Vocalizations Using Generative Approaches
The current agent-based evolutionary models for animal communication rely on simplified signal representations that differ significantly from natural vocalizations. We propose a novel agent-based evolutionary model based on text-to-audio (TTA) models to generate realistic animal vocalizations, advancing from VAE-based real-valued genotypes to TTA-based textual genotypes that generate bird songs using a fine-tuned Stable Audio Open 1.0 model. In our sexual selection framework, males vocalize songs encoded by their genotypes while females probabilistically select mates based on the similarity between males’ songs and their preference patterns, with mutations and crossovers applied to textual genotypes using a large language model (Gemma-3). As a proof of concept, we compared TTA-based and VAE-based sexual selection models for the Blue-and-white Flycatcher (Cyanoptila cyanomelana)’s songs and preferences. While the VAE-based model produces population clustering but constrains the evolution to a narrow region near the latent space’s origin where reconstructed songs remain clear, the TTA-based model enhances the genotypic and phenotypic diversity, drives song diversification, and fosters the creation of novel bird songs. Generated songs were validated by a virtual expert using the BirdNET classifier, confirming their acoustic realism through classification into related taxa. These findings highlight the potential of combining large language models and TTA models in agent-based evolutionary models for animal communication.
Authors
- Reiji Suzuki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1953-2926)
- Takaya Arita (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-2255)
- Hao Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7578-9910)
Institutions
- Nagoya University (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Applied Sciences
- Published
- 2025-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910481
- Primary Topic
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00