Bubble shape classification in a bubble column based on multi‐input <scp>ConvNeXt</scp> model

Abstract A comprehensive understanding of the continuous variation and deformation of rising bubbles is essential for precise reactor scale‐up and process optimization. This work combines telecentric vision probe and bubble boundary R‐CNN with a newly developed multi‐input ConvNeXt to pioneer bubble shape classification under realistic flow conditions. The classification results demonstrate that ellipsoidal bubbles constitute the predominant shape (49.5%), while oblate ellipsoidal bubbles represent the smallest proportions (2.7%). Statistical analysis of E and d m across all classified bubbles reveals significant distinctions: spherical and oblate ellipsoidal bubbles exhibit pronounced differences in E compared to other classes, whereas the remaining shapes show relative consistency. d m varies substantially across classes, progressively increasing in the order: spherical, ellipsoidal, spherical cap, ellipsoidal cap, oblate ellipsoidal, and wobbling ellipsoidal. While our model achieves bubble classification, unresolved issues span image quality constraints, 3D shape inference from 2D data, turbulent flow coupling, and high‐velocity applicability—necessitating integrated imaging‐algorithm advances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIChE Journal
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.70097
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bubble shape classification in a bubble column based on multi‐input ConvNeXt model

Xing-Ling Li, Wenxiang Tang, Yanqiang Huang, Zepeng Zhao et al.
AIChE Journal
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Bubble shape classification in a bubble column based on multi‐input ConvNeXt model

Xing-Ling Li, Wenxiang Tang, Yanqiang Huang, Zepeng Zhao, Qi Kang, Li Qin
article en

Abstract

Abstract A comprehensive understanding of the continuous variation and deformation of rising bubbles is essential for precise reactor scale‐up and process optimization. This work combines telecentric vision probe and bubble boundary R‐CNN with a newly developed multi‐input ConvNeXt to pioneer bubble shape classification under realistic flow conditions. The classification results demonstrate that ellipsoidal bubbles constitute the predominant shape (49.5%), while oblate ellipsoidal bubbles represent the smallest proportions (2.7%). Statistical analysis of E and d m across all classified bubbles reveals significant distinctions: spherical and oblate ellipsoidal bubbles exhibit pronounced differences in E compared to other classes, whereas the remaining shapes show relative consistency. d m varies substantially across classes, progressively increasing in the order: spherical, ellipsoidal, spherical cap, ellipsoidal cap, oblate ellipsoidal, and wobbling ellipsoidal. While our model achieves bubble classification, unresolved issues span image quality constraints, 3D shape inference from 2D data, turbulent flow coupling, and high‐velocity applicability—necessitating integrated imaging‐algorithm advances.

AIChE JournalVol. 72(1)
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (CN), Sichuan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bubble shape classification in a bubble column based on multi‐input <scp>ConvNeXt</scp> model — Xing-Ling Li, Wenxiang Tang, et al. · AIChE Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS