Barriers and facilitators of leaders' initiation of community self‐help groups for well‐being: A mixed methods study

We explored the perceived barriers and facilitators faced by leaders when initiating self-help groups (SHGs) for emotional well-being using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design that combined focus groups and an online survey. Leaders, educators, and technicians from supportive organizations participated in four focus groups (n = 22), and 46% (n = 30) of trainees from SHGs leadership training courses completed the survey. Thematic analysis of qualitative data, combined with descriptive and textual analyses of survey responses, revealed two overarching themes: learning to lead and leading in practice. Early success of SHGs was linked to leaders' self-motivation and targeted leadership training. Facilitators included shared task distribution, horizontal relationships, and active dialogue facilitated leadership, while barriers comprised perceived role overload and logistical burdens. Survey findings reinforced the importance of co-responsibility, key training elements, and external support, including meeting spaces, integration, and publicity. These results suggest that initiating and maintaining mutual SHGs for emotional well-being may require recognizing the central role of leaders. Targeted training, professional accompaniment, and a stable community network are essential supports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Community Psychology
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.70022
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators of leaders' initiation of community self‐help groups for well‐being: A mixed methods study

Luis González‐de Paz, Pablo Gálvez-Hernández, Adela de la Torre, Carmen Herranz et al.
American Journal of Community Psychology
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Barriers and facilitators of leaders' initiation of community self‐help groups for well‐being: A mixed methods study

Luis González‐de Paz, Pablo Gálvez-Hernández, Adela de la Torre, Carmen Herranz, Alicia Alcaraz‐Rodríguez, Cristina Conejo
article en

Abstract

We explored the perceived barriers and facilitators faced by leaders when initiating self-help groups (SHGs) for emotional well-being using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design that combined focus groups and an online survey. Leaders, educators, and technicians from supportive organizations participated in four focus groups (n = 22), and 46% (n = 30) of trainees from SHGs leadership training courses completed the survey. Thematic analysis of qualitative data, combined with descriptive and textual analyses of survey responses, revealed two overarching themes: learning to lead and leading in practice. Early success of SHGs was linked to leaders' self-motivation and targeted leadership training. Facilitators included shared task distribution, horizontal relationships, and active dialogue facilitated leadership, while barriers comprised perceived role overload and logistical burdens. Survey findings reinforced the importance of co-responsibility, key training elements, and external support, including meeting spaces, integration, and publicity. These results suggest that initiating and maintaining mutual SHGs for emotional well-being may require recognizing the central role of leaders. Targeted training, professional accompaniment, and a stable community network are essential supports.

American Journal of Community PsychologyVol. 77(1-2)
Consorci d’Atenció Primària de Salut Barcelona Esquerra (ES), Public Health Ontario (CA), Grup CHM Mental Salut (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Institute of Child and Mother Health (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.