Employees’ personality development goals (PDGs) at work: a contextual assessment and examination of origins

Despite the growing emphasis on "soft skills" development in organizations, employees' personality development goals (PDGs) at work remain understudied. This study brings PDGs to the work context, aiming to (1) develop a contextualized assessment instrument for PDGs and evaluate key characteristics - prevalence, temporal stability, self-other agreement, and hierarchical structure - and (2) propose and test a conceptual framework for understanding their origins. A 2-month longitudinal study with 325 employees revealed a high prevalence of PDGs, with 73% directed towards "normative" changes (i.e. increase agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to experience; decrease neuroticism), and 27% pursuing changes in non-normative directions. Informant ratings from 97 managers uncovered moderate self-other agreement, with disagreement primarily on goals that employees reported but managers did not. Moreover, PDGs demonstrated moderate temporal stability across two months. Lastly, current personality trait levels of conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and openness to experience were significantly negatively related to PDGs, while job role trait requirements were positively linked to PDGs for openness only. No trait-requirement interactions were found. In conclusion, our contextualized approach to PDG assessment provides a valuable lens for better understanding PDGs relative to specific contextual requirements, paving the way for innovative directions in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2025.2565250
Primary Topic
Human Resource and Talent Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employees’ personality development goals (PDGs) at work: a contextual assessment and examination of origins

Bart Wille, Sofie Dupré, Joyce Scheirlinckx
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Human Resource and Talent Management
article

Employees’ personality development goals (PDGs) at work: a contextual assessment and examination of origins

Bart Wille, Sofie Dupré, Joyce Scheirlinckx
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing emphasis on "soft skills" development in organizations, employees' personality development goals (PDGs) at work remain understudied. This study brings PDGs to the work context, aiming to (1) develop a contextualized assessment instrument for PDGs and evaluate key characteristics - prevalence, temporal stability, self-other agreement, and hierarchical structure - and (2) propose and test a conceptual framework for understanding their origins. A 2-month longitudinal study with 325 employees revealed a high prevalence of PDGs, with 73% directed towards "normative" changes (i.e. increase agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to experience; decrease neuroticism), and 27% pursuing changes in non-normative directions. Informant ratings from 97 managers uncovered moderate self-other agreement, with disagreement primarily on goals that employees reported but managers did not. Moreover, PDGs demonstrated moderate temporal stability across two months. Lastly, current personality trait levels of conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and openness to experience were significantly negatively related to PDGs, while job role trait requirements were positively linked to PDGs for openness only. No trait-requirement interactions were found. In conclusion, our contextualized approach to PDG assessment provides a valuable lens for better understanding PDGs relative to specific contextual requirements, paving the way for innovative directions in future research.

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Human Resource and Talent Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.