Host contract, host risk: comparing the 2026 FIFA World Cup and LA 2028 Olympics

Abstract This paper presents a comparative legal analysis of the host city agreements for the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympic Games in Los Angeles. These two mega-events provide a rare opportunity to evaluate the differing contractual frameworks imposed by the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) and the International Olympic Committee contemporaneously on the same host city. Drawing on content analysis, this study explores how each agreement structures obligations, financial responsibilities, commercial rights, jurisdictional issues, and legal risk. With some key differences, the findings reveal imbalance in favor of the awarding bodies, with both contracts shifting extensive liabilities onto the host city while reserving expansive powers for modification. The analysis also highlights the democratic and jurisdictional tensions embedded within these agreements. Despite Los Angeles’ bargaining leverage as a host for both events, the contracts are illustrative of the entrenched power asymmetries that underlie global sport governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Sports Law Journal
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-025-00314-y
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Host contract, host risk: comparing the 2026 FIFA World Cup and LA 2028 Olympics

Robert Sroka
The International Sports Law Journal
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Host contract, host risk: comparing the 2026 FIFA World Cup and LA 2028 Olympics

Robert Sroka
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a comparative legal analysis of the host city agreements for the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympic Games in Los Angeles. These two mega-events provide a rare opportunity to evaluate the differing contractual frameworks imposed by the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) and the International Olympic Committee contemporaneously on the same host city. Drawing on content analysis, this study explores how each agreement structures obligations, financial responsibilities, commercial rights, jurisdictional issues, and legal risk. With some key differences, the findings reveal imbalance in favor of the awarding bodies, with both contracts shifting extensive liabilities onto the host city while reserving expansive powers for modification. The analysis also highlights the democratic and jurisdictional tensions embedded within these agreements. Despite Los Angeles’ bargaining leverage as a host for both events, the contracts are illustrative of the entrenched power asymmetries that underlie global sport governance.

The International Sports Law JournalVol. 26(1)
Towson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.