QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL CHANGES IN FACIAL SOFT TISSUE CAUSED BY PERSONALIZED 3D-PRINTED PEEK IMPLANTS

PEEK (polyether ether ketone) has been used as a biocompatible material for implant development for several decades and with more recent advances in technology such implants now can also be manufactured by 3D printing. Due to this manufacturing process, such implants currently are limited to non-load bearing use, therefore being applicable for cosmetic surgeries, primarily for patients that have undergone trauma or disease which has impacted their bony tissue and led to unwelcome visual changes. As the aim of these type of procedures is to improve the aesthetic outcome, which more often than not is dictated by the visible soft tissue, it is paramount to understand the impact of the implant design itself, as the current approaches primarily focus on the correction of hard tissue defects at its core. To examine this, a total of four patients, each with at least one presonalised and 3D-printed PEEK implant used for facial correction in a different area (orbit, cheek, mandible and maxilla) had a CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography) scan taken before and approximately 6 months after surgery. These examinations were superimposed and then used to identify changes in the soft tissue volume, skin surface area and the total soft tissue thickness at the site of the implant. The change in soft tissue volume and the skin surface area varied only by up to 5% when compared to the implants volume and the surface area in contact with the soft tissue interface, respectively, in the majority of cases, while the total soft tissue thickness on average changed by a value equivalent to half of the implant thickness. These preliminary findings indicate, that while the current implant design process may lead to the desired outcome in improving the aesthetic of the patient, the soft tissue changes do not seem to be uniform, therefore implying that the implant design process could be improved by further understanding its relationship with the corresponding soft tissue response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.8.038
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL CHANGES IN FACIAL SOFT TISSUE CAUSED BY PERSONALIZED 3D-PRINTED PEEK IMPLANTS

Ģirts Šalms, Oskars Radziņš
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
article

QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL CHANGES IN FACIAL SOFT TISSUE CAUSED BY PERSONALIZED 3D-PRINTED PEEK IMPLANTS

Ģirts Šalms, Oskars Radziņš
article en

Abstract

PEEK (polyether ether ketone) has been used as a biocompatible material for implant development for several decades and with more recent advances in technology such implants now can also be manufactured by 3D printing. Due to this manufacturing process, such implants currently are limited to non-load bearing use, therefore being applicable for cosmetic surgeries, primarily for patients that have undergone trauma or disease which has impacted their bony tissue and led to unwelcome visual changes. As the aim of these type of procedures is to improve the aesthetic outcome, which more often than not is dictated by the visible soft tissue, it is paramount to understand the impact of the implant design itself, as the current approaches primarily focus on the correction of hard tissue defects at its core. To examine this, a total of four patients, each with at least one presonalised and 3D-printed PEEK implant used for facial correction in a different area (orbit, cheek, mandible and maxilla) had a CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography) scan taken before and approximately 6 months after surgery. These examinations were superimposed and then used to identify changes in the soft tissue volume, skin surface area and the total soft tissue thickness at the site of the implant. The change in soft tissue volume and the skin surface area varied only by up to 5% when compared to the implants volume and the surface area in contact with the soft tissue interface, respectively, in the majority of cases, while the total soft tissue thickness on average changed by a value equivalent to half of the implant thickness. These preliminary findings indicate, that while the current implant design process may lead to the desired outcome in improving the aesthetic of the patient, the soft tissue changes do not seem to be uniform, therefore implying that the implant design process could be improved by further understanding its relationship with the corresponding soft tissue response.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_8)
Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Baltic Studies Centre (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.