Evaluating the inclusiveness of employee training programmes: a research-practice partnership

Neglecting inclusiveness in employee training risks perpetuating inequality. This study addresses the need of Learning & Development teams to better understand and enhance the inclusiveness of employee training. Grounded in critical socio-culturalism and critical learning evaluation, this research explored the potential of learner survey questions focused explicitly on the inclusiveness of training to provide insights and recommendations for more inclusive training. To this end, two scholar–practitioners developed a set of learner survey questions targeting different aspects of the inclusiveness of employee training, and a subsequent case study was conducted within a multinational corporation to pilot these questions. Data collection involved think-aloud interviews, where participants verbalised their thoughts while responding to the survey questions after completing a specific training programme. Data analysis spanned participants’ experiences with, and opportunities to improve, the inclusiveness of the training, and the relevance and completeness of the survey questions. The findings indicated that inclusive-learning survey questions could be an effective tool for understanding and enhancing the inclusiveness of employee training. In addition, opportunities for improving the survey questions were identified. Future research should continue to refine the inclusive-learning survey questions, extending their application to various contexts, including educational institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Development International
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2025.2563354
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the inclusiveness of employee training programmes: a research-practice partnership

Ingeborg Kroese, Will Thalheimer
Human Resource Development International
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

Evaluating the inclusiveness of employee training programmes: a research-practice partnership

Ingeborg Kroese, Will Thalheimer
article en

Abstract

Neglecting inclusiveness in employee training risks perpetuating inequality. This study addresses the need of Learning & Development teams to better understand and enhance the inclusiveness of employee training. Grounded in critical socio-culturalism and critical learning evaluation, this research explored the potential of learner survey questions focused explicitly on the inclusiveness of training to provide insights and recommendations for more inclusive training. To this end, two scholar–practitioners developed a set of learner survey questions targeting different aspects of the inclusiveness of employee training, and a subsequent case study was conducted within a multinational corporation to pilot these questions. Data collection involved think-aloud interviews, where participants verbalised their thoughts while responding to the survey questions after completing a specific training programme. Data analysis spanned participants’ experiences with, and opportunities to improve, the inclusiveness of the training, and the relevance and completeness of the survey questions. The findings indicated that inclusive-learning survey questions could be an effective tool for understanding and enhancing the inclusiveness of employee training. In addition, opportunities for improving the survey questions were identified. Future research should continue to refine the inclusive-learning survey questions, extending their application to various contexts, including educational institutions.

Human Resource Development International
Institute for Learning and Development (US), Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.