Improving Streamflow Predictions in the Arid Southwestern United States Through Understanding of Baseflow Generation Mechanisms

Abstract Understanding the factors controlling baseflow (groundwater discharge) is critical for improving streamflow predictions in the arid southwestern United States. We used an enhanced version of the Noah‐MP land surface model with advanced hydrological process options and the Routing Application for Parallel computation of Discharge (RAPID) to examine the impacts of process representation, soil hydraulic parameters, and precipitation data sets on baseflow production and streamflow skill. Model experiments combined multiple configurations of hydrological processes, soil parameters, and three gridded precipitation products: NLDAS‐2, Integrated Multi‐satellite Retrievals for GPM Final, and NOAA AORC. RAPID was used to route Noah‐MP‐simulated runoff and generate daily streamflow at 390 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gauges. The modeled baseflow index (BFI) was compared with USGS‐derived BFI. Results show that (a) soil water retention curve model plays a dominant role, with the Van‐Genuchten hydraulic scheme reducing the overestimated BFI produced by the Brooks‐Corey, (b) hydraulic parameters (Van‐Genuchten parameters and hydraulic conductivity) strongly affect streamflow prediction, a machine learning‐based Van‐Genuchten parameters captures the USGS BFI, showing a better performance than the optimized National Water Model (NWM) by a median Kling‐Gupta Efficiency of 21%, and (c) incorporating a ponding depth threshold into the land surface models that increases infiltration is preferred. Overall, models with more physically realistic hydrologic representations show a better performance in modeling BFI and thus a better skill in streamflow predictions than the optimized NWM in the dry southwestern river basins. These findings can guide future studies in selecting reliable schemes and data sets (before calibration) to achieve better streamflow predictions as well as water resource projections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039479
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Streamflow Predictions in the Arid Southwestern United States Through Understanding of Baseflow Generation Mechanisms

Muhammad Jawad, Mohammad Ali Farmani, Ahmad A. Tavakoly, Ali Behrangi et al.
Water Resources Research
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Improving Streamflow Predictions in the Arid Southwestern United States Through Understanding of Baseflow Generation Mechanisms

Muhammad Jawad, Mohammad Ali Farmani, Ahmad A. Tavakoly, Ali Behrangi, Matthew Geheran, Guo‐Yue Niu, Hossein Yousefi Sohi, Yuan Qiu, Aniket Gupta, Xueyan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the factors controlling baseflow (groundwater discharge) is critical for improving streamflow predictions in the arid southwestern United States. We used an enhanced version of the Noah‐MP land surface model with advanced hydrological process options and the Routing Application for Parallel computation of Discharge (RAPID) to examine the impacts of process representation, soil hydraulic parameters, and precipitation data sets on baseflow production and streamflow skill. Model experiments combined multiple configurations of hydrological processes, soil parameters, and three gridded precipitation products: NLDAS‐2, Integrated Multi‐satellite Retrievals for GPM Final, and NOAA AORC. RAPID was used to route Noah‐MP‐simulated runoff and generate daily streamflow at 390 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gauges. The modeled baseflow index (BFI) was compared with USGS‐derived BFI. Results show that (a) soil water retention curve model plays a dominant role, with the Van‐Genuchten hydraulic scheme reducing the overestimated BFI produced by the Brooks‐Corey, (b) hydraulic parameters (Van‐Genuchten parameters and hydraulic conductivity) strongly affect streamflow prediction, a machine learning‐based Van‐Genuchten parameters captures the USGS BFI, showing a better performance than the optimized National Water Model (NWM) by a median Kling‐Gupta Efficiency of 21%, and (c) incorporating a ponding depth threshold into the land surface models that increases infiltration is preferred. Overall, models with more physically realistic hydrologic representations show a better performance in modeling BFI and thus a better skill in streamflow predictions than the optimized NWM in the dry southwestern river basins. These findings can guide future studies in selecting reliable schemes and data sets (before calibration) to achieve better streamflow predictions as well as water resource projections.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(10)
University of Arizona (US), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), Arizona State University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.