Browsing Pressure Modelling: Spatial Prediction of Browsing Probabilities

The global forestry discourse frequently highlights the issue of ungulate browsing, which can significantly impact tree regeneration and tree species composition by inhibition of growth and elimination of certain, particularly ecologically valuable, tree species. The forestry field often utilizes the percentage of browsed trees within a specific area, ranging from single hunting grounds to broader provincial scales, as a metric of browsing intensity. This measure correlates with ungulate density, which is known to vary across landscapes, rendering spatially averaged browsing percentages less useful for silvicultural decisions even with accurate results. Addressing this gap, we utilized a GLMM with random effects to assess tree specific browsing pressure more appropriately. We incorporated data from two adjacent areas in the northeastern limestone Alps, focussing on the four important tree species in the region (Abies alba, Acer pseudoplatanus, Fagus sylvatica, and Picea abies). We analyzed data collected with distinct methodologies for the two regions, respectively, Austrian Federal Game Impact Monitoring and Austrian Regeneration and Browsing Monitoring of Federal Forests. Overall, the data documented browsing occurrence on 8933 trees over 632 sampling plots totalling 55,000 hectares. By comparing various models, including those with spatial considerations, we found that treating sampling plot location as a latent state variable improved the model fit and allowed prediction of browsing probability on a landscape scale. This study underlines the value of incorporating spatial elements into models for assessing browsing pressure and its spatial variations, thereby facilitating more informed silvicultural decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f16101520
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Browsing Pressure Modelling: Spatial Prediction of Browsing Probabilities

Eduard Hochbichler, Kirsten Weingarth‐Dachs, Thomas Bürscher, Dominik Dachs
Forests
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Browsing Pressure Modelling: Spatial Prediction of Browsing Probabilities

Eduard Hochbichler, Kirsten Weingarth‐Dachs, Thomas Bürscher, Dominik Dachs
article en

Abstract

The global forestry discourse frequently highlights the issue of ungulate browsing, which can significantly impact tree regeneration and tree species composition by inhibition of growth and elimination of certain, particularly ecologically valuable, tree species. The forestry field often utilizes the percentage of browsed trees within a specific area, ranging from single hunting grounds to broader provincial scales, as a metric of browsing intensity. This measure correlates with ungulate density, which is known to vary across landscapes, rendering spatially averaged browsing percentages less useful for silvicultural decisions even with accurate results. Addressing this gap, we utilized a GLMM with random effects to assess tree specific browsing pressure more appropriately. We incorporated data from two adjacent areas in the northeastern limestone Alps, focussing on the four important tree species in the region (Abies alba, Acer pseudoplatanus, Fagus sylvatica, and Picea abies). We analyzed data collected with distinct methodologies for the two regions, respectively, Austrian Federal Game Impact Monitoring and Austrian Regeneration and Browsing Monitoring of Federal Forests. Overall, the data documented browsing occurrence on 8933 trees over 632 sampling plots totalling 55,000 hectares. By comparing various models, including those with spatial considerations, we found that treating sampling plot location as a latent state variable improved the model fit and allowed prediction of browsing probability on a landscape scale. This study underlines the value of incorporating spatial elements into models for assessing browsing pressure and its spatial variations, thereby facilitating more informed silvicultural decisions.

ForestsVol. 16(10)
Life Services (United States) (US), BOKU University (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.