Effects of emergency winter supplemental feeding on survival of mule deer

Abstract Ungulates in temperate regions can experience high mortality during severe winters, which poses significant ecological and economic challenges for wildlife managers. To mitigate these effects, emergency winter‐feeding programs are often implemented, although their effectiveness remains uncertain. In response to high snowfall and prolonged winter conditions in 2023, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources implemented an emergency feeding program aimed at reducing mortality among mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ). We evaluated the impact of this effort by monitoring survival of 102 mule deer with global positioning system (GPS) collars across fed (27 adults, 21 fawns) and non‐fed groups (45 adults, 9 fawns). Additionally, we assessed the body condition of adult females using estimates of ingesta‐free body fat percentage via ultrasonography. The program distributed 305 metric tons of feed at a cost of $213,500, with additional logistical expenses totaling $122,246. Of the latter amount, volunteers contributed $94,534. Adult females without supplemental feeding had a faster rate of fat loss (β = −0.01, 95% CI = −0.009–−0.001) and low overwinter survival (58%; SE = 0.07) compared to the fed group (81%; SE = 0.07). Fawn survival in the fed group was 53% (SE = 0.11), while no fawns survived in the non‐fed group. Malnutrition was the primary cause of mortality in both groups. Key factors contributing to increased survival in the fed deer included the timely and sustained feeding, ration composition, strategic site selection, and distribution methods at feeding sites. Logistical support from volunteers was crucial for the timely implementation of the program. The program incurred a total expenditure of $335,746, resulting in the survival of an estimated 1,099 mule deer at an average cost of $305.50 per deer. Although the program successfully enhanced overwinter survival, particularly among the most vulnerable group—fawns—the substantial costs involved underscore the necessity to carefully balance such interventions against their economic viability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70121
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of emergency winter supplemental feeding on survival of mule deer

Kent R. Hersey, Sam Robertson, Randy T. Larsen, Ranjana Pal et al.
Journal of Wildlife Management
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Effects of emergency winter supplemental feeding on survival of mule deer

Kent R. Hersey, Sam Robertson, Randy T. Larsen, Ranjana Pal, Jules A. Barnes, Brock R. McMillan, Brendan W. Knight, Kevin A. Royal, Travis R. Hobbs
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ungulates in temperate regions can experience high mortality during severe winters, which poses significant ecological and economic challenges for wildlife managers. To mitigate these effects, emergency winter‐feeding programs are often implemented, although their effectiveness remains uncertain. In response to high snowfall and prolonged winter conditions in 2023, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources implemented an emergency feeding program aimed at reducing mortality among mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ). We evaluated the impact of this effort by monitoring survival of 102 mule deer with global positioning system (GPS) collars across fed (27 adults, 21 fawns) and non‐fed groups (45 adults, 9 fawns). Additionally, we assessed the body condition of adult females using estimates of ingesta‐free body fat percentage via ultrasonography. The program distributed 305 metric tons of feed at a cost of $213,500, with additional logistical expenses totaling $122,246. Of the latter amount, volunteers contributed $94,534. Adult females without supplemental feeding had a faster rate of fat loss (β = −0.01, 95% CI = −0.009–−0.001) and low overwinter survival (58%; SE = 0.07) compared to the fed group (81%; SE = 0.07). Fawn survival in the fed group was 53% (SE = 0.11), while no fawns survived in the non‐fed group. Malnutrition was the primary cause of mortality in both groups. Key factors contributing to increased survival in the fed deer included the timely and sustained feeding, ration composition, strategic site selection, and distribution methods at feeding sites. Logistical support from volunteers was crucial for the timely implementation of the program. The program incurred a total expenditure of $335,746, resulting in the survival of an estimated 1,099 mule deer at an average cost of $305.50 per deer. Although the program successfully enhanced overwinter survival, particularly among the most vulnerable group—fawns—the substantial costs involved underscore the necessity to carefully balance such interventions against their economic viability.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 90(1)
Brigham Young University (US), Utah Geological Survey (US), ID-FISH Technology (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.