Estimation of Forearm Pronation–Supination Angles Using MediaPipe and IMU Sensors: Performance Comparison and Interpretability Analysis of Machine Learning Models

This study aimed to develop a non-contact, marker-less machine learning model to estimate forearm pronation–supination angles using 2D hand landmarks derived from MediaPipe Hands, with inertial measurement unit sensor angles used as reference values. Twenty healthy adults were recorded under two camera conditions: medial (in-camera) and lateral (out-camera) viewpoints. Five regression models were trained and evaluated: Linear Regression, ElasticNet, Support Vector machine (SVM), Random Forest, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Among them, LightGBM achieved the highest accuracy, with a mean absolute error of 5.61° in the in-camera setting and 4.65° in the out-camera setting. The corresponding R2 values were 0.973 and 0.976, respectively. The SHAP analysis identified geometric variations in the palmar triangle as the primary contributors, whereas elbow joint landmarks had a limited effect on model predictions. These results suggest that forearm rotational angles can be reliably estimated from 2D images, with an accuracy comparable to that of conventional goniometers. This technique offers a promising alternative for functional evaluation in clinical settings without requiring physical contact or markers and may facilitate real-time assessment in remote rehabilitation or outpatient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910527
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of Forearm Pronation–Supination Angles Using MediaPipe and IMU Sensors: Performance Comparison and Interpretability Analysis of Machine Learning Models

Yutaka Mifune, D. Nakabayashi, Issei Shinohara, Kohei Yamaura et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
article

Estimation of Forearm Pronation–Supination Angles Using MediaPipe and IMU Sensors: Performance Comparison and Interpretability Analysis of Machine Learning Models

Yutaka Mifune, D. Nakabayashi, Issei Shinohara, Kohei Yamaura, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Takanobu Higashi, Shunsaku Takigami, Masaya Kusunose, Ryosuke Kuroda, Shuya Tanaka, Atsuyuki Inui, Shin Osawa, Yutaka Ehara, Ryota Wakamatsu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a non-contact, marker-less machine learning model to estimate forearm pronation–supination angles using 2D hand landmarks derived from MediaPipe Hands, with inertial measurement unit sensor angles used as reference values. Twenty healthy adults were recorded under two camera conditions: medial (in-camera) and lateral (out-camera) viewpoints. Five regression models were trained and evaluated: Linear Regression, ElasticNet, Support Vector machine (SVM), Random Forest, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Among them, LightGBM achieved the highest accuracy, with a mean absolute error of 5.61° in the in-camera setting and 4.65° in the out-camera setting. The corresponding R2 values were 0.973 and 0.976, respectively. The SHAP analysis identified geometric variations in the palmar triangle as the primary contributors, whereas elbow joint landmarks had a limited effect on model predictions. These results suggest that forearm rotational angles can be reliably estimated from 2D images, with an accuracy comparable to that of conventional goniometers. This technique offers a promising alternative for functional evaluation in clinical settings without requiring physical contact or markers and may facilitate real-time assessment in remote rehabilitation or outpatient care.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(19)
Kobe University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.