Comparison of FNR and GNR Based on TROPOMI Satellite Data for Ozone Sensitivity Analysis in Chinese Urban Agglomerations

Currently, ozone (O3) has become one of the primary air pollutants in China, underscoring the importance of analyzing ozone formation sensitivity (OFS) for effective pollution control. Ozone sensitivity indices serve as effective tools for OFS identification. Among them, the ratio of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to nitrogen oxides (NOx)—such as the formaldehyde-to-nitrogen dioxide ratio (FNR, defined as HCHO/NO2, where HCHO represents VOCs and NO2 represents NOx)—is one of the most widely used satellite-based indicators. Recent studies have highlighted glyoxal (CHOCHO) as another critical ozone precursor, prompting the proposal of the glyoxal-to-nitrogen dioxide ratio (GNR, CHOCHO/NO2) as an alternative metric. This study systematically compares the performance of FNR and GNR across four major urban agglomerations in China: Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), the Pearl River Delta (PRD), and the Chengdu–Chongqing (CY) region, by integrating satellite remote sensing with ground-based observations. Results reveal that both indices exhibit consistent spatial trends in OFS distribution, transitioning from VOC-limited regimes in urban centers to NOx-limited regimes in surrounding suburban areas. However, differences emerge in threshold values and classification outcomes. During summer, FNR identifies urban areas as transitional regimes (or VOC-limited in regions such as YRD and PRD), while suburban areas are classified as NOx-limited. In contrast, GNR, which shows heightened sensitive to anthropogenic VOCs (AVOCs), exhibits a more restricted spatial extent in the transition regimes. By autumn, most urban areas shift toward VOC-limited regimes, while suburban regions remain NOx-limited. Thresholds for both VOCs and NOx increase during this period, with GNR demonstrating stronger sensitivity to NOx. These findings underscore that the choice between FNR and GNR directly influences OFS determination, as their differing responses to biogenic and anthropogenic emissions lead to different conclusions. Future research should focus on integrating the complementary strengths of both indices to develop a more robust OFS identification method, thereby providing a theoretical basis for formulating effective ozone control strategies.