A CORPUS-BASED LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE MARKER USAGE IN ENGLISH GRADUATE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS

This study investigated the use of discourse markers (DMs) in English graduate students’ academic presentations to assess their academic tone. Using a mixed-method design and a corpus-based approach, the analysis was grounded in the three meta-functions of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics (1978). Moreover, the Fung and Carter’s (2007) four-category DM categorization framework was used. Additionally, AntConc software was used to analyze DMs frequencies, KWIC, and collocations, while Python was applied for data filtration and visualization. The data were collected from 60 MS English students at COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI) over two academic years (Spring 2023-Fall 2024) and were transcribed and compiled into a corpus of 67,166 tokens. However, after preprocessing with Python (spaCy), the final corpus was reduced to 37,554 tokens. Results showed that cognitive markers category accounted for 39% of usage, followed by referential markers (36%), interpersonal (19%), and structural markers (6%). The most frequent individual DMs encompassed “like” (731), “you know” and “so” (341 each), “but” (330), and “also” (307). These frequencies indicated a strong reliance on non-academic markers. In contrast, academic DMs were used less frequently. For instance, “finally” appeared 55 times, “however” 13 times, and “therefore” nine times, while other formal markers such as “additionally” and “to sum up” appeared fewer than ten times. These results reflect a significant reliance on non-academic tone and conversational features in students’ academic speech. The study highlights the need for targeted pedagogical interventions to enhance students’ awareness and use of academic DMs in spoken academic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1280
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A CORPUS-BASED LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE MARKER USAGE IN ENGLISH GRADUATE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS

S. M. Azizul Hakim, Sadia Siddiq, Muhammad Nawaz
Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

A CORPUS-BASED LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE MARKER USAGE IN ENGLISH GRADUATE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS

S. M. Azizul Hakim, Sadia Siddiq, Muhammad Nawaz
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the use of discourse markers (DMs) in English graduate students’ academic presentations to assess their academic tone. Using a mixed-method design and a corpus-based approach, the analysis was grounded in the three meta-functions of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics (1978). Moreover, the Fung and Carter’s (2007) four-category DM categorization framework was used. Additionally, AntConc software was used to analyze DMs frequencies, KWIC, and collocations, while Python was applied for data filtration and visualization. The data were collected from 60 MS English students at COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI) over two academic years (Spring 2023-Fall 2024) and were transcribed and compiled into a corpus of 67,166 tokens. However, after preprocessing with Python (spaCy), the final corpus was reduced to 37,554 tokens. Results showed that cognitive markers category accounted for 39% of usage, followed by referential markers (36%), interpersonal (19%), and structural markers (6%). The most frequent individual DMs encompassed “like” (731), “you know” and “so” (341 each), “but” (330), and “also” (307). These frequencies indicated a strong reliance on non-academic markers. In contrast, academic DMs were used less frequently. For instance, “finally” appeared 55 times, “however” 13 times, and “therefore” nine times, while other formal markers such as “additionally” and “to sum up” appeared fewer than ten times. These results reflect a significant reliance on non-academic tone and conversational features in students’ academic speech. The study highlights the need for targeted pedagogical interventions to enhance students’ awareness and use of academic DMs in spoken academic settings.

Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)Vol. 8(3)
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.