Diurnal Habitat Selection and Use of Wintering Bar-Headed Geese (Anser indicus) Across Heterogeneous Landscapes on the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, Southwest China

Wetland loss and human activities are forcing migratory waterbirds to rely on alternative habitats such as croplands, yet their adaptive habitat use across contrasting landscape contexts remains unclear. The Bar-headed Goose (<i>Anser indicus</i>) is a key indicator species in the wetland ecosystems of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Comparing differences in its wintering habitat selection and utilization is of great significance for understanding its ecological adaptation mechanisms and formulating regional wetland conservation strategies. In this study, we compared the diurnal habitat use during the wintering period of Bar-headed Geese at three wetlands (Nianhu, Caohai, and Napahai) representing distinct landscape contexts. We used GPS satellite tracking and dynamic Brownian bridge movement modeling, combined with random forest analysis of environmental variables, to quantify diurnal habitat use and selection at each site. Our results revealed significant regional differences in habitat use. In the agriculture-dominated wetlands (Nianhu and Caohai), geese primarily utilized cropland and marsh habitats (Nianhu: cropland 45.88% ± 30.70%, marsh 42.55% ± 33.17%; Caohai: cropland 62.33% ± 12.16%, marsh 28.61% ± 13.62%). In contrast, at Napahai, which is dominated by natural habitats, geese primarily used grassland (65.92% ± 20.01%) and marsh (26.85% ± 21.88%), with minimal use of cropland (4.21% ± 7.00%). Diurnal habitat selection was influenced by multiple environmental factors, with distinct regional differences identified through random forest modeling. In Nianhu, key factors included distance to supplemental feeding site, distance to grassland, distance to woodland, and distance to open water. In Caohai, distance to grassland, distance to nocturnal roost site, distance to settlement, and distance to open water were significant drivers. In Napahai, distance to nocturnal roost site, distance to open water, and distance to marsh were the most influential (all with <i>p</i> < 0.01), reflecting flexible behavioral responses. Based on these findings, we recommend region-specific conservation management strategies. Specifically, supplemental feeding at Nianhu should be strictly regulated. Agricultural planning in farming areas should account for the habitat needs of wintering waterbirds. Grassland and marsh habitats at Napahai should also be more effectively protected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192826
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diurnal Habitat Selection and Use of Wintering Bar-Headed Geese (Anser indicus) Across Heterogeneous Landscapes on the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, Southwest China

Wenjing Yan, Z. J. Meng, Lei Yu, Longzhu Xiao et al.
Animals
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Diurnal Habitat Selection and Use of Wintering Bar-Headed Geese (Anser indicus) Across Heterogeneous Landscapes on the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, Southwest China

Wenjing Yan, Z. J. Meng, Lei Yu, Longzhu Xiao, Zhiming Chen, Chao Li, Qiang Liu, Hong Liu, Xuyan Zhao
article en

Abstract

Wetland loss and human activities are forcing migratory waterbirds to rely on alternative habitats such as croplands, yet their adaptive habitat use across contrasting landscape contexts remains unclear. The Bar-headed Goose (<i>Anser indicus</i>) is a key indicator species in the wetland ecosystems of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Comparing differences in its wintering habitat selection and utilization is of great significance for understanding its ecological adaptation mechanisms and formulating regional wetland conservation strategies. In this study, we compared the diurnal habitat use during the wintering period of Bar-headed Geese at three wetlands (Nianhu, Caohai, and Napahai) representing distinct landscape contexts. We used GPS satellite tracking and dynamic Brownian bridge movement modeling, combined with random forest analysis of environmental variables, to quantify diurnal habitat use and selection at each site. Our results revealed significant regional differences in habitat use. In the agriculture-dominated wetlands (Nianhu and Caohai), geese primarily utilized cropland and marsh habitats (Nianhu: cropland 45.88% ± 30.70%, marsh 42.55% ± 33.17%; Caohai: cropland 62.33% ± 12.16%, marsh 28.61% ± 13.62%). In contrast, at Napahai, which is dominated by natural habitats, geese primarily used grassland (65.92% ± 20.01%) and marsh (26.85% ± 21.88%), with minimal use of cropland (4.21% ± 7.00%). Diurnal habitat selection was influenced by multiple environmental factors, with distinct regional differences identified through random forest modeling. In Nianhu, key factors included distance to supplemental feeding site, distance to grassland, distance to woodland, and distance to open water. In Caohai, distance to grassland, distance to nocturnal roost site, distance to settlement, and distance to open water were significant drivers. In Napahai, distance to nocturnal roost site, distance to open water, and distance to marsh were the most influential (all with <i>p</i> < 0.01), reflecting flexible behavioral responses. Based on these findings, we recommend region-specific conservation management strategies. Specifically, supplemental feeding at Nianhu should be strictly regulated. Agricultural planning in farming areas should account for the habitat needs of wintering waterbirds. Grassland and marsh habitats at Napahai should also be more effectively protected.

AnimalsVol. 15(19)
Southwest Forestry University (CN), Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.