Категория «национальное достояние» и ее соотношение с публичной собственностью

The article examines the legal nature of the category "national heritage" and its correlation with public and state property. It is noted that, despite the absence of this concept in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, it is actively applied in legislation and law enforcement practice. The author emphasizes that national heritage differs from state property in its essence, as it is inalienable, belongs to the entire society, and not to any individual. Various scientific positions are presented, according to which national heritage may include the natural resource complex, while state property encompasses state-owned assets, enterprises, and other objects. Particular attention is paid to the risks of reducing national heritage solely to state property, which historically led to the alienation of resources from society. In conclusion, the importance of further study of this category is highlighted in order to develop an effective model of public governance. Keywords: national heritage, public property, state property, natural resources, public wealth, constitutional law, legal nature, people’s ownership, legal regulation, public governance

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific works Adilet
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54649/2077-9860-2025-1-52-58
Primary Topic
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Категория «национальное достояние» и ее соотношение с публичной собственностью

A.I. Konovalov
Scientific works Adilet
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
article

Категория «национальное достояние» и ее соотношение с публичной собственностью

A.I. Konovalov
article en

Abstract

The article examines the legal nature of the category "national heritage" and its correlation with public and state property. It is noted that, despite the absence of this concept in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, it is actively applied in legislation and law enforcement practice. The author emphasizes that national heritage differs from state property in its essence, as it is inalienable, belongs to the entire society, and not to any individual. Various scientific positions are presented, according to which national heritage may include the natural resource complex, while state property encompasses state-owned assets, enterprises, and other objects. Particular attention is paid to the risks of reducing national heritage solely to state property, which historically led to the alienation of resources from society. In conclusion, the importance of further study of this category is highlighted in order to develop an effective model of public governance. Keywords: national heritage, public property, state property, natural resources, public wealth, constitutional law, legal nature, people’s ownership, legal regulation, public governance

Scientific works Adilet(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Legal and Regulatory Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Категория «национальное достояние» и ее соотношение с публичной собственностью — A.I. Konovalov · Scientific works Adilet (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS