The Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Survival in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: The prognostic immune and nutritional index (PINI), derived from serum albumin levels and absolute monocyte counts, has demonstrated prognostic value in gastrointestinal cancers. However, its role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study assessed the prognostic utility of the PINI for overall survival (OS) in patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC undergoing curative-intent resection. <i>Methods</i>: This was a retrospective cohort study that included 522 patients. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between PINI and OS along with clinical and hematologic variables. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), integrated area under the curve (iAUC), continuous net reclassification improvement (cNRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), nomogram construction, and calibration curves. <i>Results</i>: In the multivariate analysis, the PINI remained an independent predictor of OS, along with age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, stage, pleural invasion, and the modified Shine-Lal index. The full model (FM), incorporating all these variables, outperformed the baseline model (BM) that was based solely on stage (C-index: 0.841 vs. 0.692; iAUC: 0.804 vs. 0.663; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared with the intermediate model (IM), which included all FM variables except the PINI, the FM demonstrated modest but statistically significant improvements (C-index: 0.841 vs. 0.820, <i>p</i> = 0.012; iAUC: 0.804 vs. 0.793, <i>p</i> = 0.001). At 3- and 5-year time points, the FM still yielded superior risk reclassification over the BM and IM, as indicated by improvements in IDI and cNRI. A nomogram based on the FM showed good calibration with the observed survival outcomes. <i>Conclusions</i>: The PINI is an independent and clinically meaningful prognostic biomarker in patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC undergoing curative surgery. Incorporating the PINI into the BM or IM improved risk discrimination and reclassification, supporting its potential use in personalized prognostic assessment. However, external validation is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101763
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Survival in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Sehyun Kim, Wan Kyu Eo, Soomin An, Sookyung Lee
Medicina
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

The Prognostic Immune and Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Survival in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Sehyun Kim, Wan Kyu Eo, Soomin An, Sookyung Lee
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: The prognostic immune and nutritional index (PINI), derived from serum albumin levels and absolute monocyte counts, has demonstrated prognostic value in gastrointestinal cancers. However, its role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study assessed the prognostic utility of the PINI for overall survival (OS) in patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC undergoing curative-intent resection. <i>Methods</i>: This was a retrospective cohort study that included 522 patients. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between PINI and OS along with clinical and hematologic variables. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), integrated area under the curve (iAUC), continuous net reclassification improvement (cNRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), nomogram construction, and calibration curves. <i>Results</i>: In the multivariate analysis, the PINI remained an independent predictor of OS, along with age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, stage, pleural invasion, and the modified Shine-Lal index. The full model (FM), incorporating all these variables, outperformed the baseline model (BM) that was based solely on stage (C-index: 0.841 vs. 0.692; iAUC: 0.804 vs. 0.663; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Compared with the intermediate model (IM), which included all FM variables except the PINI, the FM demonstrated modest but statistically significant improvements (C-index: 0.841 vs. 0.820, <i>p</i> = 0.012; iAUC: 0.804 vs. 0.793, <i>p</i> = 0.001). At 3- and 5-year time points, the FM still yielded superior risk reclassification over the BM and IM, as indicated by improvements in IDI and cNRI. A nomogram based on the FM showed good calibration with the observed survival outcomes. <i>Conclusions</i>: The PINI is an independent and clinically meaningful prognostic biomarker in patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC undergoing curative surgery. Incorporating the PINI into the BM or IM improved risk discrimination and reclassification, supporting its potential use in personalized prognostic assessment. However, external validation is warranted.

MedicinaVol. 61(10)
Dongyang University (KR), Kyung Hee University (KR), Dankook University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.