The association between oral risk assessment and obstetric and newborn outcomes

Abstract Background Periodontal disease in pregnancy is a known risk factor for adverse obstetric and offspring outcomes, including preeclampsia and preterm birth. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends screening all pregnant patients on their first obstetric visit with a simple, self‐administered, three‐question oral risk assessment survey. Yet, no studies have evaluated whether a positive screen on this oral risk assessment is associated with adverse obstetric or newborn outcomes. Objective We sought to assess the relationship between a positive overall oral risk assessment and preterm birth, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, and newborn birthweight. Study design We screened pregnant individuals at a university‐based prenatal clinic using the three‐question ACOG‐recommended oral risk assessment survey. We performed unadjusted and adjusted linear and logistic regression models to evaluate associations between screening questions and pregnancy/offspring outcomes. Results Among 1242 screened pregnant patients, 50.3% (625 patients) had an overall positive screen with 21.7% (269), 43.1% (535), and 13.6% (169) screening positive on questions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Patients who had an overall positive screen for heightened risk for oral disease had significantly increased odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 2.16), gestational hypertension (aOR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.65), and gestational diabetes (aOR: 1.79, 95% CI 1.20, 2.67). Those with symptomatic oral disease (question 1) had a significantly increased odds of preeclampsia (aOR: 1.77, 95% CI 1.04, 2.99). Those who sought help finding a dentist (question 3) had significantly reduced odds of gestational hypertension (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.97) and gave birth to infants with a significantly higher birthweight (+177.9 g; 95% CI: +40.3 g, +315.5 g). Conclusions Symptomatic oral disease (question 1) is associated with adverse health outcomes. Surprisingly, seeking help in accessing dental care (affirmative response to question 3) is associated with improved outcomes. The differing associations highlight the importance of asking each question, and future research is needed to determine potential biological pathways linking the survey responses with adverse obstetric outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70114
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The association between oral risk assessment and obstetric and newborn outcomes

Kathryn J. Gray, Carolina Martinez‐King, Shruti Kulkarni, Krystle Perez et al.
Pregnancy
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

The association between oral risk assessment and obstetric and newborn outcomes

Kathryn J. Gray, Carolina Martinez‐King, Shruti Kulkarni, Krystle Perez, Gregory C. Valentine, Tingzhong Yang, Olivia C. Brandon, Thomas R. Wood, Abdul Hameed, Charlie Rose, Annika Sahota, Kanika Nallaseth, Sophia Tibayan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Periodontal disease in pregnancy is a known risk factor for adverse obstetric and offspring outcomes, including preeclampsia and preterm birth. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends screening all pregnant patients on their first obstetric visit with a simple, self‐administered, three‐question oral risk assessment survey. Yet, no studies have evaluated whether a positive screen on this oral risk assessment is associated with adverse obstetric or newborn outcomes. Objective We sought to assess the relationship between a positive overall oral risk assessment and preterm birth, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, and newborn birthweight. Study design We screened pregnant individuals at a university‐based prenatal clinic using the three‐question ACOG‐recommended oral risk assessment survey. We performed unadjusted and adjusted linear and logistic regression models to evaluate associations between screening questions and pregnancy/offspring outcomes. Results Among 1242 screened pregnant patients, 50.3% (625 patients) had an overall positive screen with 21.7% (269), 43.1% (535), and 13.6% (169) screening positive on questions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Patients who had an overall positive screen for heightened risk for oral disease had significantly increased odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 2.16), gestational hypertension (aOR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.65), and gestational diabetes (aOR: 1.79, 95% CI 1.20, 2.67). Those with symptomatic oral disease (question 1) had a significantly increased odds of preeclampsia (aOR: 1.77, 95% CI 1.04, 2.99). Those who sought help finding a dentist (question 3) had significantly reduced odds of gestational hypertension (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.97) and gave birth to infants with a significantly higher birthweight (+177.9 g; 95% CI: +40.3 g, +315.5 g). Conclusions Symptomatic oral disease (question 1) is associated with adverse health outcomes. Surprisingly, seeking help in accessing dental care (affirmative response to question 3) is associated with improved outcomes. The differing associations highlight the importance of asking each question, and future research is needed to determine potential biological pathways linking the survey responses with adverse obstetric outcomes.

PregnancyVol. 1(6)
Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.